| " | Just thought you all should know. Several topics have been compromised with this exploit as well. |
| " | Enough of the hate |
| " | Well spotted! Login / registration is now required to vote. |
| " | FurrinGok wrote: |
| In addition to the large number of votes, the merchant system they wanted to use wouldn't work for them if they allowed cub |
| " | which heavily weighed in favor of the ban anyways. |
| " | Zaltys wrote: |
| Which is to be expected since the vote only ran for a few days |
| " | and those who wanted it banned had large "go vote for this"-style campaigns. |
| " | Whereas many (most?) of the users who would've opposed the ban only learned about it afterwards, because they generally don't follow artists and blogs that are anti-porn and pro-censorship. |
| " | fryhop wrote: |
| you have to consider both sides probably did that cheating vote side, both probbaly would have lowered, i would no doubt it probably would have been still more anti-cubs or even voting with legit voters. |
| " | Varka wrote: |
| a large number of our users express concerns about our content policy |
| " | FancyCat wrote: |
| But, think of the children! |
| " | If cub artists are excluded from these services, the community stands to lose out on a large scale. |
| " | curtainshowers wrote: |
| then they're probably not worth visiting. |
| " | FriskyWoods wrote: |
| I'm okay with FN banning cub artwork, although I wish they'd done it from the start rather than pretending there was ever a choice. What bothers me is that babyfur artists who AREN'T posting explicit pictures are getting punished too, for the crime of having diapers in their art. |
| " | Having learned of this issue, they should obviously do the voting again, but they won't because they were most likely looking for an excuse to get rid of cub art anyway.. |
| " | No one has the right to harass anyone for their tastes or the content of artwork they post on Inkbunny. |
| " | supremekitten wrote: |
| I don't think cub art should be banned at all, anywhere, neither do I think there should be a vote for it to be banned. I don't think loli or shota should be banned either, or 3d, or any art which doesn't directly hurt some person by slander or by some other way. |
| " | I'm only saying, that if this is supposed to be viewed as a democratic decision, then the vote obviously should be redone, because it was faulty. |
| " | lolLNno wrote: |
| Honestly I'm not bothered by the fact that cub is banned there, but as you said, there should be a re-vote now that the exploit has been fixed. |
| " | No one has the right to harass anyone for their tastes or the content of artwork they post on Inkbunny. Inkbunny encourages a community where people of all different interests can co-exist. The community attitude is one of acceptance of the widest possible range of views and ideas, as long as they do not encourage hate and intolerance. |
| " |
Even so? So what's the big deal? Who cares? FurryNetwork will prove to be a heavy contender when it comes to furry creation services. The tools they discussed at the BLFC presentation are going to be like Etsy and Patreon for the fandom rolled into one. Commission escrow, arbitration, credit card processing, shipping, you name it. If cub artists are excluded from these services, the community stands to lose out on a large scale. Are we going to stand for that? This is an attack on more than just posting naughty pictures. This is a conspiracy to monetarily disenfranchise people based on false premise. THAT, I might mention IS against the law. |
