Inkbunny

Oh damn.

Aryentai

5 years, 11 months ago

link

hum...... ok, hey budy, wanna look my gallery? i started to do images like you

lordbeast69

5 years, 11 months ago

link

@ Aryentai

move to a different site bud im moving

Aryentai

5 years, 11 months ago

link

what site do you recommend me?

lordbeast69

5 years, 11 months ago

link

@ Aryentai

im heading to https://thelordbeast69.tumblr.com/

NeenBeanMachine

5 years, 11 months ago

link

@ Aryentai

Someone named ToxicTigerEX has a fair following over on FurAffinity, and he does a lot of SFM stuff and edits/headhacks of KabalMystic's models. I'll probably move over to Tumblr but I'll head to FA too.

Hornybunny

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Have you tried contacting

GreenReaper

directly?
Ask the head dragon himself.

GreenReaper

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Edited 5 years, 11 months ago by Owner

It's in the rules and that was the way it was meant to be applied. The problem is that it isn't an original model that they created, or had created for them. We just don't see the artistic value in having 1000 different renderings of the same model, in repetitive "show off my genitals" poses, any more than 1000 different photos of the same fursuit (especially if the model/fursuit isn't even "their art" to begin with).

chacumera

5 years, 11 months ago

link

what about SFM video's?

kamperkiller

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Okay, so if people used their own hand made assets instead of MMD Models Ripped from Sonic games then "upgraded" with little effort to SFM would that be okay?

GreenReaper

5 years, 11 months ago

link

@ kamperkiller

Yes, because they'd be original models. We don't have an issue with the character. Just the rendering of the same assets in a relatively unoriginal fashion that just shows off features of the models that we've already seen 1000 times.

We've also allowed reasonable use of unoriginal models to show off an original costume that needs to be rigged on a model in order to display it as it was intended (similar to how you need your fursuit to show off a new fursuit costume, even if we have seen that fursuit before) - as long as the use of the model is within the derivative works policy (including appropriate crediting, which many people don't).

SetsuneW

5 years, 10 months ago

link

Wow, this is the exact same talk FA started before it yanked me around like a ragdoll over Poser. And it was all up to the whims of the admin currently looking at it. I followed the rules to the letter there, and I STILL got snide comments from admins and even had to purge my account once over it. Retroactively applied new rules, right before they changed again.

Animation work is work. It should not have to pass some arbitrary bar to be considered "good enough". Otherwise, you'd better be prepared to apply the same "quality standard" to drawings. And let's not even start on music, unless you're going to require any digital artist to record every single sample themselves.

I've dealt with this elitism at FA before, and I don't want to see it here. I thought IB was better than that.

SetsuneW

5 years, 10 months ago

link

@ SetsuneW

I wrote this before seeing your feelings on 3D works as a whole. I won't try to appeal to you any further on the matter.

Jeffron

5 years, 10 months ago

link

@ SetsuneW

I agree with you, as soemone who does 3D animation vids for posting on youtube I cannot tell you how long it takes for me just to make a ONE SECOND CLIP, hell even a THREE second clip.

You have to put the time to make sure the motions good, you gotta make some adjustments, etc, that can take up to at minimum three to four hours, plus depending on what you're rendering, 3, 5, six hours, hell I've done animation clips that took me 10 hours to render. It's ridiculous how much effort is actually put into that. Seems really unfair judgement 3D artists are getting here.

Sorry to ignite an old topic btw, still I'm with you on this regard.

Hornybunny

5 years, 11 months ago

link

I take it that this applies to free to use or pay to use bases.

GreenReaper

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Edited 5 years, 11 months ago by Owner

Yes, the distinction is whether they're yours or created specifically for you vs. available to everyone (for a price or otherwise). I could see us extending that to a specific group of artists where they have all had input into the creation of a model.

Hornybunny

5 years, 11 months ago

link

That would mean 90+% of my non-written gallery isn't allowed.

GreenReaper

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Then I guess you are lucky that I'm packing for ConFuzzled and don't have time to go hunting through your gallery? >_>;

Hornybunny

5 years, 11 months ago

link

I don't have the time or energy or will power to delete 1000+ items from my gallery.

StoneHedgeArchive

1 year, 7 months ago

link

Oh wow... very professional...

papertoilet

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Uh, should we really be worrying about “artistic value”? Context should be noted, here.

GreenReaper

5 years, 8 months ago

link

@ papertoilet

The context is "Inkbunny isn't just a furry porn site looking for content that will get lots of views, it's a volunteer effort run by donations, and we'd rather host a bunch of kinda-crappy-looking but original renders of people's own models over highly polished but identical 3D models if it helped people develop as artists".

We can have a discussion about whether such works heavily relying on derivative works effectively constitute sketches in 3D, but part of my concern is that people are using the existence of prebuilt models as a crutch to avoid developing the relevant model-building skills. That'd be more acceptable if the non-original components were stated upfront, but with this kind of work it's almost never even tracked, let alone mentioned.

MisterPhantom

5 years, 11 months ago

link

you could make a furaffinity and post stuff there too, they allow human stuff too

Hornybunny

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Technically, fa has the same policy.

MisterPhantom

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Edited 5 years, 11 months ago by Owner

Pixiv?

MisterPhantom

5 years, 11 months ago

link

"	Hornybunny wrote:
	Technically, fa has the same policy.

are you sure, cus I've been in fa and they're still posting sfm stuff without posting a jornal of how they don't allow it anymore

RawAxis

5 years, 11 months ago

link

I can confirm they're more strict in FA...

But same as in here mods don't have the time to check on all users so if an user is not very famous they won't ever notice.

MisterPhantom

5 years, 11 months ago

link

e621.net then

RawAxis

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Yeah that would be a good alternative, there isn't much of a community there but at least IB users could post links of their works here.

lordbeast69

5 years, 11 months ago

link

E621 hates sfm as Well they take them down in like a few hours

RawAxis

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Ooops, well there is also pornhub lol, but yeah it has to be animated.

lordbeast69

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Even my animated one got taken down lol

RawAxis

5 years, 11 months ago

link

From pornhub? I still see a lot of Sonic SFM animations in there...

lordbeast69

5 years, 11 months ago

link

my Animation is on pornhub so are

Darksorm

videos and

shockingace

videos so its a good place

RawAxis

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Glad to know that!

Keeran

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Edited 5 years, 11 months ago by Owner

ecchi.iwara.tv may be your best shot, buy credit must be given

RawAxis

5 years, 11 months ago

link

@ Keeran

I will check that out since is the first time I hear about it

DarkAlex

5 years, 11 months ago

link

Edited 5 years, 11 months ago by Owner

They don't hate sfm. They remove all low-effort or low-quality content. I haven't seen them removing any SFM content if it's something more than a badly-lit scene with weird poses.

kamimatsu

3 years, 7 months ago

link