Good day, I am once again posting art here, been a while I know. I previously felt my art didn't 100% fit on here, but recently I realized, maybe it doesn't have to fit 100%. I also was wary of the ru...
Sorry if this is inconvenient or bad, and sorry for not saying sooner. I really like this website but I have never really felt like a furry artist and moved away from drawing even borderline-furry art...
I decided their name doesn't really work anymore so I'd like to decide a new name for Idunno, and I thought it might be fun to have a vote. https://www.strawpoll.me/18826108
We don't call gay people groomers and pedophiles. We call groomers and pedophiles what they are. The "LGBTQ+ community" is a convenient smokescreen for them, when they are called out they accuse others of -phobias, a behavior you are enabling. You are a groomer enabler.
Also most ideologies have a history of targeting homosexuals including leftoid ideologies lmao, because most people used to be homophobic. I'm on the gay right (we're gayer than you), not a homophobe ↓
We don't call gay people groomers and pedophiles. We call groomers and pedophiles what they are. The
Sure, that's why the right keeps calling gay people groomers and pedophiles. Because they totally don't hate gay people.
Unlike you, I'm old enough to remember when the right's target was gay men/women, then most of them moved on to trans people, and once they're done with trans people, they're gonna go right back to targeting gay men/women.
Some haven't even given up on that, they're still trying to paint all gay men as pedophiles. Also, at Luxioboi's mentioning of your twitter, I took a look at it. You're not even trying to hide how schizophrenic you are about LGBT people existing, lmao.
Sure, that's why the right keeps calling gay people groomers and pedophiles. Because they totally do
I don't think it's possible to make a regulation (that's Constitutional anyway) that ONLY targets THOSE SPECIFIC companies, and doesn't apply to the economy at large - let alone ones that don't affect the consumer.
Regulation is what got us into this mess, further regulation will only compound it - if not now, then later. Deregulation is the path forward.
I don't think it's possible to make a regulation (that's Constitutional anyway) that ONLY targets TH
And the reason they can do stuff like that (and indeed are encouraged to do so) is because of regulations already existing in the market. Deregulation, not further regulation, is the solution; further regulation will just be another knife government can wield against us.
And the reason they can do stuff like that (and indeed are encouraged to do so) is because of regula
Bad idea; regulation is what got us into this mess in the first place, it will only complicate matters further; deregulation is a better tool for combating silicon valley.
Bad idea; regulation is what got us into this mess in the first place, it will only complicate matte
