Funny that.
I'm sure the timing is entirely coincidental, and that my last journal had absolutely nothing to do with the sudden realization that, "I failed to review [the submissions] properly at the time."
If my submissions always were in violation, then, fine. I won't contest their removal.
Only... you and I both know why you did this. I've been in this moment before, again and again on FurAffinity. Rules that had not been enforced for years are suddenly enforced strictly to the letter, by sheer random roll of the dice, right after I say something that makes someone feel so upset they are filled with a desire to punish.
I only wonder if that was you, or if you let that person use you as their instrument.
Did you think I wouldn't draw attention to it?
UPDATE: "I reviewed them because your journal had me on your account due to some of the comments it received and I noticed the AI submissions using Bing."
These were, of course, the same submissions that this support team member had noticed before, reviewed before, and had allowed to continue existing on the site before. That time, I was told that the problem was that I had not properly made all the seed and model data available. This time it was to inform me that a free, public-use generator model is closed source and not downloadable. This team member wants to prevent users from keeping their generations within a "walled garden". That's very important, I'm sure. Important enough that it just... slipped their mind the first time. Despite me putting the name of the model I used explicitly on many of the images themselves. But hey, mistakes happen. I'm sure there's no pattern. I'm sure I'm just seeing coincidences in randomness.
| Viewed: |
150 times |
| Added: |
4 days, 2 hrs ago
13 Sep 2025 02:38 CEST
|
|
|
