Welcome to Inkbunny...

To view member-only content, create an account. ( Hide )

The Inkbunny Admins Don't Support A.I. Art

by FurBrush

So, even though there's a crap ton of people who post A.I. art here on this platform, and do so without posting their prompts etc.  Inkbunny thinks that I'm supposed to devulge that information, or I can't post here.  I do apologize to those that were enjoying the poop and relieval art I was making here.

If anyone can suggest another place to post pic/series, let me know and I'll move all the pieces over there.  Thanks for being awesome those of you who have messaged and enjoyed the poop art that I create.

It's hard to find GOOD poop/relieval art, and I know that I make some good stuff that people want to see over a lot of the mess, and with Inkbunny Admin just censoring it, I don't think I can stay here to post.  So if there's a good suggestion on where to move, I will take my art over to a better platform where they actually support A.I. created art.

Thanks so much for the help you guys!

Viewed:	63 times
Added:	10 months, 2 weeks ago 09 Jan 2024 11:24 CET

6 Comments on this Journal

Leave a Comment...

coolperez8

10 months, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 10 months, 2 weeks ago by Owner

Okay. Any advice

Reizinho

?

Reizinho

10 months, 2 weeks ago

link

@ coolperez8

Furtastic.art.

coolperez8

10 months, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Reizinho

Okay.

GreenReaper

10 months, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 10 months, 2 weeks ago by Owner

The process of converting someone who does not meet the AI content policy to someone who does has to start somewhere - and it didn't start with you. You are just one of the people we happened to talk to yesterday; others were contacted the day before, and there will be more today, as for other policy violations. Inkbunny has a limited staff and cannot contact everyone at once, so we prioritize a) reports, and b) what work we happen to run into.

As for "censorship", that depends on the issue. If you use closed-source tools or models, then yes; we outright censor those as objectionable - many of our members do object to companies profiting off images potentially generated from training on their artwork. Or the same if you were, say, trying to duplicate other artists' work by using their names or work as inputs. For the most part, we don't care about the topic.

You seemingly just don't want to post the tools and inputs you used to make them, which is part of how we can feasibly detect the earlier issues. You also have pages of packs of pre-generated images on sale, which might be undermined if the methods you used to generate them were revealed. These two things may be unrelated - after all, it's faster and easier not to add metadata - but it is hard to ignore entirely.

FA's a site that doesn't support AI art. We support it with conditions. You just don't like them.

AutoSnep

9 months, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 9 months, 2 weeks ago by Owner

@ GreenReaper

"	many of our members do object to companies profiting off images potentially generated from training on their artwork

Wait. Is profit the deciding factor? Microsoft offers DALL-E for free. Meta offers Imagine for free. Google offers Imagen for free. And there're other less widely known companies.

Sure, they all are free as in beer, not free as in speech, but as far as money goes, they actively burn massive amounts of money on their free offers. In terms of models being accessible to people without decent hardware, I'd say these free offers are considerably cheaper than Stable Diffusion.

Also, regarding free as in speech. A lot of people complain that overwhelming majority of current "open" models aren't actually open because they're "free weights", not "free datasets and tools". So in terms of traditional understanding of open-source, they're closer to free as in beer really ("freeware" of sorts), with very few exceptions.

Anyway... If profit is the deciding factor, I'd be super interested in DALL-E and Suno being allowed. Both are "freeware" with very generous limits and valuable capabilities in terms of furry-related art.

AlexReynard

9 months, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 9 months, 2 weeks ago by Owner

As someone who's wholly onboard with AI art, if this place sets up guidelines for posting it, and you don't meet them, then they're not being unfair if they catch you. It's a huge site and I doubt they're scouring every single submission for adherence to the rules. I'm actually glad they aren't, because Furaffinity is like that, and back when I was part of it, it was a nightmare of unchecked admin power trips. InkBunny is so much more chill. Just take a second and post the prompts.

EDIT: That said, I am honestly jealous of how well-rendered you manage to get your poops. I'm broke enough I'm stuck with Bing, so I have to come up with all sorts of linguistic tricks like 'brown sludge' to not get censored. :P

New Comment:

Move reply box to top ↑

Log in or create an account to comment.

Help

Information

Policy & Legal

All artwork and other content is copyright its respective owners.

Powered by Harmony 'Gravitation' Release 80.

Content Server: Virginia Cache - provided by Inkbunny Donors. Background: Blank Gray.

The Inkbunny web application, artwork, name and logo are copyright and trademark of their respective owners.