At long last, my constant hell of waking up super early in the morning to work half awake for the entire month is over! Normally I would take advantage of having the afternoon free to stream and chill out, but the one thing that I don't want is to have my mate or my friends waking up of of their schedule to take me to work. I'm not one to be an annoyance to those I care about. Even if it means dealing with the struggles myself. (It's how I do =~_~= )
At least @Blazger and I managed to do a little shopping spree gift for myself for my birthday/valentines that weekend. This weekend is sure to be interesting to say the least. This will be my first time chilling at Fur Squared so I hope it'll be just as cool as FCN back in the day.
With that said, I'm pretty sure that you know what's going on with the United Nations trying to make underage artwork illegal by labeling it as actual child pron. So aside from the usual art's not real and comparing concept, I'm just going have my own unique say in the subject matter. Careful though, because this could get a little dark.
First off, why would anyone believe that is anyone would draw, write or even create 3D models (assuming the definition of 'dolls' ) warrants the act of "FBI OPEN UP!" And before anyone brings up the lst of the common answers and arguments that goes against the idea, I'm going to actually dive into the process of said pedophilia acts. Why, because explaining it fully is the only way the phrase "Art is not Rape" makes sense.
First off, the person has to find said target, find out where they live, what school they go to, their friends, parents, places said victim(s) are going to, their internet info, all of that nonsense. And then there's the actual attempt to contacting them without 1) giving themself away 2) being suspicious 3) traced 4) caught by the target's parents. Finally comes the cope de graci. And even IF that's successful, there the ultimate hassle of having no evidence of getting caught afterwards. AND THE UNITED NATIONS THINKS THAT'S WHAT PICTURES, 3D MODELS, AND FICTIONAL NOVELS ARE ENTITLED TOO?
If that's the case, why not hunt the artists and those that fave them down right now? I'm pretty sure that there are a TON of stained glassed furries on FA would love to have that happen. Who would have thought that all it takes is a '3' on it's side and half of an elongated oval above between Calvin's legs for everyone to flip the fuck out in real life. *head-desk*
Sorry for having to go into detail on the acts of a pedo in my view. Anyone who's smart enough wouldn't even dare make any attempt to a child, no less say "hello" to them out of the blue.
I've already signed the petition from an earlier journal.
If the U.S. government got duped into passing that as federal law, it would be bad enough in my case where only a relatively small percent of my gallery is sexual explicit cub... ...What would be even more so bad is how tough it would really be on those who's galleries are either all or mostly NSFW cub. Some of those galleries would have years of artwork wiped out overnight...some being 20 to 30 pages going back to 7 to 12 years ago, with 2,000 or more watches and 50,000 to 100,000 faves...Gone...Cleaned out like a vacuum cleaner got it. I do know for some artists, it would wipe out their entire galleries 100%.
I'd have to say a move like that would also whittle my list of faves I've given down to not much left.
*I've already signed the petition from an earlier journal. If the U.S. government got duped into p
In my view, if something is okay to do in real life, it's okay to draw it. Example: Two adults pawing each other off and both are fine with it? Okay. Two cubs pawing each other off and both are fine with it? Okay.
Because there's certainly enough stuff that's not okay in real life drawn, and no one is trying to get rid of it...
In my view, if something is okay to do in real life, it's okay to draw it. Example: Two adults pawin
