I know that. That's the explicit version, and I get charging for that.
I'm talking about the nude version. They're wearing clothes, which already don't hide anything in this shot, and have to pay to have them nude. So you're paying for a subtraction rather than a plus. It's like charging people more to draw a pony without a cutie mark.
I guess for some people they just prefer no clothes, but with the clothes they're wearing not blocking anything I just don't see it that way for this particular piece.
I know that. That's the explicit version, and I get charging for that. I'm talking about the nude v
The "nude" version that you would be paying for in this case is the mare bits version. the explicit version is another composition which goes further, mare bits winking/open with wetness. In this case it has nothing to do with the clothes they are wearing. I hope this clears things up! :3
The "nude" version that you would be paying for in this case is the mare bits version. the explicit
