(below), I don't think you always need contractions, but they are useful most of the time. on the other hand, there's the...I dunno what it's officially called. like a contraction, but different. like instead of a hundred, a hunnid. or isn't, innit. I use stuff like doncha (don't you), whatcha (what('re) you), and a'ight (alright/all right). they have their purpose grammatically, especially among friends that know you know how to say those things normally, but you're just being casual and speaking in a way that reflects that.
oh yeah. Wuzzat? (What's that?)
For translation, I agree with this one a hundred percent. for style, I'd use "This show sucks!" for
I believe that those words are called slang words. (Being a southerner I know ALL about them, especially the words you used. LOL.) I also understand what you're saying; but, never using contractions makes the conversation seem stilted. (I show this in a story I've written that I'm currently uploading.) Therefore, I'd use a combination of both. This would make the speaker seem a bit more, shall we say, human. LOL.
I believe that those words are called slang words. (Being a southerner I know ALL about them, espec
Yeah, contractions are very helpful for speech. I believe the word for things like "hunnit" is an informal contraction. Those can be great if you want to get across the location of characters in a story, since a lot of them are location sensitive, but they're really hard to write while seeming natural.
Yeah, contractions are very helpful for speech. I believe the word for things like "hunnit" is an in
In panel 4, I'd change it from "Huh?" to either "Huh? What's that?" or just "What's that?" Also, you should put contractions as much as possible, i.e. isn't for is not, they're for they are, etc.
In panel 4, I'd change it from "Huh?" to either "Huh? What's that?" or just "What's that?" Also,
