Cub porn is legal, but be warned: some folks have been imprisoned in the United States for having similar materials (namely lolicon manga) because even though the drawings are fully legal, they used obscenity laws, in which the definition of obscenity are so vague that they're entirely subject to the personal interpretation of whomever is judging it, to skirt around the legality of the underaged-looking content.
So my suggestion is to keep it quiet, don't show it off or leave it somewhere where average people might see it and then freak out and call the cops on you over it.
Cub porn is legal, but be warned: some folks have been imprisoned in the United States for having si
Additionally, I've heard of cub porn being used as reason for harassment or leverage for harassment by police and used as quasi-evidence against people when it comes to any legal situation involving children (such as accusations, formal charges, and child custody) or potential sex crimes. Even if it's never evidence of actual wrongdoing, some courts have let lawyers get away with saying "we don't have direct evidence the defendant broke the law, but LOOK AT WHAT WE FOUND ON THEIR COMPUTER!" to shock the jury a bit and let them make conclusions from that.
However, things like cub porn and loli artwork has in the past been successfully defended under the 1st Amendment for being just that, art. As long as it's the work of fiction and not based off of real children, it is supposed to be protected under the constitution, but it can fall into a gray area. Nonetheless, it can be powerful leverage if someone already doesn't like you.
Indeed. That's how I understand it, though you may want to look through actual Kansas statue here (
Caveat: I am not a lawyer and my following answer is not legal advice.
I am not aware of any law or legal precedent within the U.S. covering cub art. There are a small number of cases covering human-lolicon manga/doujins and it's my understanding most of them were thrown out or were changed to plea deals without official charges. A few had official charges, but that's rare. It seems rare for such cases to crop up in the first place, really.
I am not aware of any court case in Kansas surrounding anything related to cub artwork or lolicon artwork.
But I'd imagine cub art would have greater leeway than lolicon art regardless. While I don't know if the defense has been made in the U.S., it is my understanding that InkBunny is legal under Australian law as, while Australian law forbids depictions of bestiality or humans in sexual circumstances, it doesn't consider furries human and thus InkBunny's avoids that restriction under Australian law.
I am not a lawyer and nothing of what I said is meant to be construed as legal advice.
Caveat: I am not a lawyer and my following answer is not legal advice. I am not aware of any law or
