It's one thing when a cub like anthropomorphic animal character in a NSFW drawing gets you kicked off a site like FA.
However, that's really some crap when that same drawing gets you 2 years in a state penitentiary. After SB-20 becomes law, I suspect the 1st person caught in Texas uploading an image of an anthropomorphic animal cub in a NSFW situation will be made an example of with that person's name and address plastered all over the news media...Not to mention that person's computer, and all storage media being seized, and computer techs working for the state of Texas deleting all that person's internet accounts.
I can picture a setting in an attorney's office in Texas where such a defendant is being advised by their defence attorney, "I'd strongly advise against making anymore art work in the future. You should give it up. The way the laws are now days, not being careful what you draw can get you in deep do-do, like you're in now. There are other hobbies you can pursue like...oh say... macrame, gardening, music. Those things aren't as likely to get you in trouble with Texas authorities".
I saw this from the AI on Google:
"
Federal role and state limitations It is important to note that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates internet service providers (ISPs) at the federal level and has, at various times, preempted states from enacting their own net neutrality regulations. This means states cannot create their own laws to fully govern the internet in the way the federal government can.
It's one thing when a cub like anthropomorphic animal character in a NSFW drawing gets you kicked of