Nope I did not delete it

by neitsuke

Just got back from a short break after a few days. That previous incident/venting got my mind stuck in an infinite loop and needed some time to flush and reset it. Asperger syndrome thing
And well looks like it's gone. Bit ironic to consider exposing and explaining vilification for the past 10 years, as being the vilification of people, but whatever. Didn't get banned for it. Fair enough

Anyway. I have to reiterate that it's really not the sort of vent/rant I'm used to make and it was entirely driven by integrity and intellectual honesty after what happened the past week-end. I've nothing to gain from it. I'm from the left, liberal, atheist and somewhat bi (Mostly straight, ask my friend Mecha)

Well time for me to go back playing some games then maybe draw some porn, like the highly moral individual I am

Ittekimasu !

Viewed:	49 times
Added:	1 month ago 09 Apr 2025 23:51 CEST

8 Comments on this Journal

Leave a Comment...

Qunt

1 month ago

link

Come on man you're not fooling anyone you deleted your last Journal most likely of embarrassment. If Moderation or Administration took it down you would have complained and would not think it was fair being the "free speech" advocate you think you are.
This was never driven by intellectual honesty.
And no you're not on the left or a liberal a glance and search for your twitter tells us your an anti-sjw right wing type.

neitsuke

1 month ago

link

Edited 1 month ago by Owner

@ Qunt

When you already have a preconstructed and programmed conclusion stemming from heavy confirmation biases issue yeah sure. Start with the conclusion that feels the best to you and work from there, ignore everything else
I'll be nice and pretend you're playing the Poe's law card

And to your other response since you seem to have a hard time comprehending the reading of text, or at best memory issues. I said in the journal that there was some semblance of free speech back in place, nothing more. You also for some reason think that outright banning people for stating facts of life or any sort of disagreement is equal to tweets being hidden for being slurs, which once again tells me there's some big confirmation biases at play here

Qunt

1 month ago

link

@ neitsuke

Heh no rebuttal to anything I just said just thowing around logical fallacy words that don't apply to make yourself look smarter than you are.
If you were smart you would say something of substance in defense or better yet be honest.
I don't like liars and you're not doing a good job at it.

neitsuke

1 month ago

link

Edited 1 month ago by Owner

@ Qunt

Look. The truth is I could show you a screencap of the PM I got from the admins about the removal. I can show you tweets I did mocking arguments for a God from religious people. You won't accept them and will ad hoc with either "I made them up", or scapegoat with a "It doesn't matter I made my mind about you already" response anyway

The problem with you guys is you're taught what to think, not how to think
Your entire way of thinking is surface level coated with tons of cognitive, confirmation and projection issues. You say no rebuttal yet here you are asserting what my positions are. Zero rebuttal presented. Zero substance, "No you lie no you lie". Your entire game plan consists of label sorting people automatically for specific positions they hold, not all of them, and ignore all the evidence presented to the contrary, which is interestingly very similar to how religious people have a very hard time accepting the facts despite the huge amount of evidence presented to them, and how leaving religion to become an atheist is extremely rare, because they were taught what to think from the very beginning of their life and changing their mind decades later is extremely hard and painful

Being slurs or not isn't really the issue. I do think the entire premise of hiding tweets over slurs is stupid, but nowhere close as how bad things were back then censorship wise. False bans is and always has been a problem but again was done a lot more viciously before (Ironically this done far more by one side than the other as a tactic to silence others. Guess which side it is). The only way to be banned for slurs should be by harassing people using them, as per Guidelines/TOS/Whatever
I would argue that those terms are slurs anyway, because those are specifically made and used to denigrate what's considered the norm ; Normal, male female without the fluff. Nobody uses those terms but people who have been redefining the terms and biological realities for the rest of society. Again, I have to repeat it because I'm sure you forgot that I mentioned that seconds ago. I think hiding/banning for using slurs is stupid and shouldn't be a thing
Riddle me this. This whole thing about gender identity is to be what you are. So then, when someone says he does not identify as cis, but simply as a male or female, why is the label still forced upon them ? Why is gender identity now not important anymore ?

To be fair I did not explain at the time why I expressed a semblance of free speech was back, and to my defense that's because I expected most people ; Ones without a huge confirmation bias, to know it was about heavy censorship from one side to the other going on for almost a decade. Having that largely reversed is factually more free speech back compared to before, as imperfect as it is right now

Qunt

1 month ago

link

Edited 1 month ago by Owner

@ neitsuke

"Cis" and "Cisgender" are not slurs and I'm not talking about tweets that we're hidden I'm talking about accounts that were outright banned just for saying one of the two.
I never gave any implication that stating facts of life or disagreement is equal to tweets being hidden you made that one up
and no some semblance of free speech has not come back it got worse.

StandoCat

1 month ago

link

@ Qunt

are you obsessed with this guy or something, why are you still bothering? just block and move on.
surely you got better things to do than purposefully let yourself be miserable arguing with someone who holds dissenting beliefs

neitsuke

1 month ago

link

@ StandoCat

The guy while being mildly annoying, is at least open for discourse and did not just comment then block, which is commendable to some degree
I'm likely not going to continue it anymore anyway because it's at the stage where I would very likely repeat myself if he does respond

StandoCat

1 month ago

link

Edited 1 month ago by Owner

@ neitsuke

fair enough. it's just funny to me how some people will engage in a discussion even though they continue to be a brick wall

New Comment:

Move reply box to top ↑

Log in or create an account to comment.