Welcome to Inkbunny...
Allowed ratings
To view member-only content, create an account. ( Hide )
DanteAffinityXD

Be Wary of Rage Bait

Before you get mad—get sus.

Check their post history. Are they acting in good faith? Or are they manipulating you to mine karma?

Lately, I’ve noticed something that could spiral into something ugly—and I want to throw water on it before it gets worse.

On pro-AI art social media, I’ve seen disturbing images circulating—memes like “We must kill AI artists.” These posts are getting traction, with AI artists feeling attacked and convinced that traditional artists are turning into trolls. In response, the rage builds. The memes get re-posted - and feels less like a meme each time, while someone is probably thinking about making retaliatory memes. The cycle continues.

But here’s the thing: I don’t think it’s real.

I started digging through the accounts posting this stuff, and what I found was sketchy as hell. Many don’t look like real people. They look like sockpuppets. Their account is a month old. They post “name my dog” for their three dogs and a cat they supposedly got last week—then pivot to political outrage and inflammatory memes.

Are they passionate about these topics? Doesn’t look like it.
Many are not here to discuss—they’re here to farm karma from your anger and they seem to aim for the posts that get the clicks.

And the worst part?
They’re probably playing both sides.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re also posting, “Look what AI artists are saying about us!” in traditional artist spaces. Suddenly, both sides feel attacked. Both sides escalate.
Hatred multiplies—because some loser wanted internet points.

So:
If you see rage bait, stop and check the source.
If it smells fake, treat as sus.
If it’s rage farming—downvote it into oblivion.
If it's real, realize they might not have the same insight as you and may be escalating against a completely imagined threat.

The world is rough enough already. Don’t let trolls convince us to hate each other over crap that isn’t even real. I’m not saying there aren’t real problems. I’m saying—don’t become someone else’s puppet.

Stay safe and stay savy out there - and hopefully this information helps knock some air out of some of the bad things you run into. I used to believe someone else would point this out if it happened... because that would have been a great pwn back in my day... but that doesn't seem to happen these days, so you gotta put that detective hat yourself.

Always aim to be kind and understanding.
- Dante out!
Viewed: 42 times
Added: 3 weeks ago
 
KevinSnowpaw
3 weeks ago
" And the worst part?
They’re probably playing both sides.


Honestly WOULD NOT shock me there are parties with a vested interest in farming outrage...does not matter WHAT outrage.
DanteAffinityXD
2 weeks, 2 days ago
Just gotta do our best to survive the craziness O_O. Day by day.
Rodgerblue
3 weeks ago
Trolls thrive on feedback. Deny them the feast.
DanteAffinityXD
2 weeks, 5 days ago
Not a crumb to 'em!
VarraTheVap
3 weeks ago
Have certainly seen artists I used to respect, retweet those meme-like images calling to kill AI artists and blow up datacenters. So yeah, there are such smallminded people out there sadly :/
A lot is surely ragebait too though, you are right.

By the way, what sre you thoughts on the word "Synthography"?
https://inkbunny.net/j/552819-VarraTheVap-an-interestin...
DanteAffinityXD
2 weeks, 6 days ago
Yes they might say these things, but perhaps a measure of consideration is worth adding to any verdict of their guilt or innocence. It feels almost akin to a perverse version of entrapment, where one has to wonder if these individuals would have made such a post themselves if the first person (possibly of dubious motives), hadn't made the original post to begin with. Also, did this happen in a vacuum, or has the artist been subject to content that gives them impression they are open game for harassment and thus... concludes they too must react in kind as a kind of verbal self defense. Unfortunately, these aren't things we can tell, so I am left only with reasonable doubt without asking people questions they might be hostile to, or not even know the answer. I suspect they likely don't.

-----

As for word play, I'd throw my hat in the ring and say "computational oneiromancy". Herein, I am no artist but merely a muse, whispering hypnotic suggestions in the form of booru-inpired incantations, weighting prompts with little numbers and rolling dice until a GPU hallucinates some dream I particularly enjoy from a roar of random noise. It's likely not all that different from auditory pareidolia or seeing fantasies in clouds, except these a bit more clear... Also, where else have I seen a person with 10 fingered hands than in my dreams - fingers never work in dreams either! So, I'm an oneiromancer that can bring artifacts from this digital dream world back to ours in little rectangles of pixels, which I can trace and perfect and have lots of fun with them :3.

Synthography isn't a terrible name, either, I suppose though I would likely associate "synthetic photography" with this: https://superhivemarket.com/products/lens-sim?search_id... . I mostly use AI Art because my work looks more like an art piece and less like a photograph (and I spend 8 hours drawing on them). Still, it's less the process of making the duck and more that it looks like a duck and quacks like one when it's done. Moreover, people simply know what I mean when I say it. Language also comes with baggage, too. If this is a kind of art... well then it's potentially grabbing many of the protections that artists have (and the result, an image, isn't that different in the end). If it's a kind of photography... well then what you can do with it might be different and ai content that looks like photography, like nudify apps ect. already get treated like such - even though the underlying tech is the same. So that leaves the question of if it's something new entirely? Then suddenly it has to fight for all the rights all over again from scratch - but also because the end result looks similar enough to art, any conclusion made on synthography that looks like art, is likely to eventually make it over to art as well.

Language itself? That doesn't bother me. Whatever everyone goes with, I will use simply because I want people to understand me when I speak. If that changes to synthography, so be it.
New Comment:
Move reply box to top
Log in or create an account to comment.