My commission sheet only until it is convenient to move it off-site; it's too convenient to link to one place with my comms info.
My Freya Crescent modelsheet both as a resource and my last real obligation to this site; after I update this (whenever I get to it) I'm more than done here until someone else takes over, and even then I'm probably putting it here last.
And that's the gist of it. Maybe with the dude who took my favorite color dips from the site I'll unhide everything, I just wanted to do one last spiteful action in-case I get randomly logged out or banned. That said, unless I really can trust you, I'm not accepting friend requests.
I'm also gonna be posting more on Baraag and StellarFur. Fuckit, maybe I'll revive my dormant-ass Newgrounds. We also have a discord server.
Okay, seriously, I told myself the next time I get a notification about this topic, I was going to ask: what's actually going on here? What did this guy actually do/say specifically. And I don't want vague "transphobic BS" or whatever, be specific. Perhaps provide a link, if possible. I can't trust whether or not someone is a real transphob, or just not a radical unless I have receipts.
Okay, seriously, I told myself the next time I get a notification about this topic, I was going to a
OK, from what I could read on the link, and I read as much as what I can deduce was relevant as possible, GreenReaper seemed quite reasonable. He honestly just seems like a free-speech advocate, who takes it farther than most people, which I think is far from a bad thing.
To address your comment in particular: I would like to agree that the bathroom thing is quite stupid. I wouldn't call it transphobic, but as someone who thinks using urinals is morally equivalent to at least peeing behind the dumpster, if not literally a form of public exposure, and does it seem much reason for segregating bathrooms anyway, I definitely believe that is a stupid talking point.
But I believe the sports topic is complicated. I don't care about sports either, but I do care about people who do care about sports. While I do understand that HRT can decrease the strength of those going from male to female, but it's still possible for a trans woman to still have an advantage no matter how long they're on HRT, and even aside from that, those just starting HRT would obviously still have their male advantages, so there would still need to be a minimum amount of time that were on HRT in order to keep things fair. Not letting trans-women into women sports is not inherently transphobic.
I also have to say that the surrounding comments don't inspire a lot of confidence. It's a lot of the standard "if you don't agree with everything we believe, then you must be a secret bigot" type of thing.
Your citation actually put me on his side. As someone who strives for bayesien thinking, nothing is truly a 100% or 0%, it's still possible he tolerates legitimate transphobia and harassment, like but he does seem like the most reasonable one in that particular thread.
Thank you for putting in the effort, I greatly appreciate it! And from my prior interactions with you: you definitely seem like a good person!
OK, from what I could read on the link, and I read as much as what I can deduce was relevant as poss
"Male advantages". None of the 10 trans women participating have placed higher than other cis women athletes. The whole reason we have different sex based sports is because the patriarchal society has deemed 'women fragile' when they most certainly are not. Testosterone can help a LOT in building muscle or otherwise pushing oneself through aggressive force, but by that logic, trans women have LESS advantage than you think. They're dealing with bodies that aren't fully working as intended. The whole sports rhetoric is also based on misinformation about male and female anatomy that is spread by people who want to treat women as 'lesser people' too.
This has nothing to do with 'secret bigot', this has to do with the fact he refuses to show respect and refuses to remove harassment based posts just because they're transphobic, meaning he's siding with the bigots and assholes who come to this site, to not share artwork, but rile up other users for a laugh.
I know Green Reaper well. He's commented on multiple journals, and he has stated "I don't think groups of people should feel safe." and he has stated "A group of trans people ousted me for not REFUSING to use the right pronouns" and he still refuses. He has gone on record doing this over the years. When a famous cub furry died, Nicol, he refused to address her as a woman because she never got surgery.
Your logic is flawed in agreeing with him.
"Male advantages". None of the 10 trans women participating have placed higher than other cis women
You unironically used the word "patriarchal", this demonstrates you have a very clear bias that makes you less capable of perceiving reality, and lacking the self awareness to necessary to perceive reality properly despite this bias. I do not trust anything you say. I will not take you seriously.
You unironically used the word "patriarchal", this demonstrates you have a very clear bias that make
"You use language for its real purpose, you have a bias" You've said everything I need to know about your delusions. Do you have any other trigger words that make you distrust people?You claim I have a bias and no self awareness, when I have way more than you. To deny that men have ruled society is to deny anthropological understanding of humanity itself. We're not an equal society, and we are most certainly not a matriarchal society. The fact that women are still fighting for equal rights in the US is proof enough of that.
I do not take you seriously, because you're a brainwashed individual who thinks 'buzzwords' define what you should believe in a person, instead of what those words actually mean. You want to FIND reasons to hate people, you want to FIND reasons to be upset and triggered.
You've revealed your hand. That is all I needed you to do. Learn to be better, and for fucks sakes, stop relying on 'buzzwords' to make you hate people. I used the fucking word properly.
You're not worth talking to, and the fact you're a blank account recently made 2 months ago says you're likely either a sock puppet or a troll who only comes to this site to harass others. You're the problem.
"You use language for its real purpose, you have a bias" You've said everything I need to know about
Addendum: https://thevarsity.ca/2017/07/31/why-do-we-still-divide... An article from 2017 that has information on why we still separate sports by gender. The primary reason being TESTOSTERONE, not estrogen, not because 'women are weaker', not because 'men have advantages', but solely hormonal reasons. And trans women have been proven to not only have lower Testosterone, but in some cases, tested with LESS testosterone than some cis women athletes.
I am willing to obtain more sources, if other people wish to chime in, but I'm not going to argue with a person who gets triggered by the word 'patriarchal' like some man-child who can't handle literacy used in the proper sense.
EDIT: Forgot to mention, it's also about "Social Standards", which is where "Patriarchal Society" comes in, where men are treated as superior for one reason or another to women, either in physicality or leadership or other reasons, in this case, it's physical prowess, which is false. While some differences exist innately, they are not the total ceiling.
Addendum: https://thevarsity.ca/2017/07/31/why-do-we-still-divide-sports-by-gender/ An article from
You judge people based on them telling the truth, simply because you have drank the right wing poison stating that this word and that word are immediate indicators of frauds, morons and liars.
You're the one with no credibility, actually. Completely having fallen for the trap of the tainted word tactic.
You judge people based on them telling the truth, simply because you have drank the right wing poiso
You assume I'm right wing simply because I don't accept the patriarchy conspiracy theory. You are the one who has drunken ideological poison, not I. The person I responded to wasn't speaking truth, they were spreading misinformation.
You assume I'm right wing simply because I don't accept the patriarchy conspiracy theory. You are th
Refusal to refute 'misinformation' with sources, only going off of "They said a word that I don't like", isn't a basis of scientific peer review. He ain't worth your time, nor talking to.
These types are snobs who think they can combat you with your own logic without a proper basis of doing so. They already know I fight Misinformation, and thus think they can claim I'm spreading it without giving proof other than "They say bad word!" By that logic, I could say his faith is horrible for using the word "Bayesien" to counter his argument, stating "You used this word, your argument is invalid because you believe in Bayesian models!" That's exactly the same argument they offer.
It's not worth arguing with these people. They'll come up with delusions to try to 'gotcha' you, without evidence of doing so.
Also, I LOVE how he said you assumed he was right wing, you didn't even say he was, just that he drank the same poison that they draw from. He doesn't even understand that context, thus further proof he has no clue how to properly exchange or debate people, he just wants to find ways to piss people off.
Refusal to refute 'misinformation' with sources, only going off of "They said a word that I don't li
Look, I don't care if you want to come in and start tagging my stuff "Skinny Legs" or "Skinny Male" even when it didn't really make sense, but this conversation is a massive headache. Especially since I am a transwoman.
I cannot, physically, link you every single time GR was being a dense asshole at best; as I said when I answered your question, this spans multiple journals from different artists and it's so. Fucking. Exhausting. Trying to keep up with a rabid transphobe who's in Self-Destructively Overly-Defensive Mode. And also we do fucking live in a Christo-fascist PATRIARCHAL society that actively discriminates against myself and most of the people I care about, and with every goddamn day having some new shit to deal with, why the fuck should I or Skoon or Amey or literally anyone try to keep up with mini-Nero torching his furry-porn Rome?
Honestly was hoping to just stay off Inkbunny today beyond basic housekeeping (ie; notification cleaning) but that's a tall fucking ask.
Look, I don't care if you want to come in and start tagging my stuff "Skinny Legs" or "Skinny Male"
Yeah; it's why I took down one of my sketch collections. We got into a spat about it on an already emotionally/mentally-precarious day and I just couldn't handle scrolling down to remove the comments.
Yeah; it's why I took down one of my sketch collections. We got into a spat about it on an already e
It's impossible too, because even if you do cite sources they'll just act ignorant anyway.
Failing that, if you actually do manage to sway one- inevitably another chud comes along and makes the same ignorant demands again.
This is why the "it's not my job to educate you" narrative sprang up ten years ago. Like, man, we've already sourced it three, four, fifty times. If you really want to see, go look for yourself. Do the work. Sometimes it will even be in the very same journal or forum thread or tweet thread or whatever that they are demanding sources in. Dude, scroll up.
It's draining. We don't just exist to argue with chuds all day, yet dare to defend yourself against real tyranny and that becomes you.
That said, I have a repository of screenshots of Green being a Transphobe dating all the way back to 2011.
SpoonFox has seemingly blocked me, as I cannot respond to any of their comments. Note how they reply to my comments, because I didn't block, because I am not afraid of them debunking me. The fact that they felt blocking me was reasonable, despite the fact I was obviously not harassing them, to me shows that their intellectual coward, who believed themselves truly incapable of being wrong. I look towards expressed that I don't take them seriously, but I can at least always and I'll let the possibility of being wrong, even if I don't always verbally say it, as evident by the fact I allowed them to say what they wanted to say.
To quickly address their points: I know what "patriarchy" means, I also know what "Illuminati" means. If someone were to cite the Illuminati as to being the real reason as to why sports are gender segregated, while there would always technically be at least an infinitesimal chance that the Illuminati is real and is behind gender segregation in sports, I would still be well within reason to dismiss them offhandedly, because such a claim would be ridiculous, and I have better things to do than explain why it's ridiculous. "Patriarchy" is just a feminist excuse to ignore biology, and blame everything on sexism, because they can't handle dealing with the actual complexities of life. Appealing to "patriarchy" is exactly equally as absurd as appealing to the "Illuminati".
And too respond to their claim of this being a sock puppet or troll account, because this account was made to months ago, and it's "blank". I'm assuming by "blank" I assume they mean the lack of works and journals, because they sure can't be talking about my favorites list. My account was made only two months ago because I never felt the need to use ink bunny until I got banned from e621 for "making up new tags", (remembering their terminology off the top of my head,) with there citation the entirety of my tag edit history, which I should not have to explain the problem with. I'm not going to go into detail, since I already done so in my email to them, which I shared through tweet, but the point is that after I got banned I wanted to boycott them, because I felt it was unfair, and so figured it was high time to make accounts on platforms my favorite artists were, so that I may be able to see them, follow them, and blacklist whatever I needed to. What could possibly be sinister about this?
I'm here because I like the art, and the artists behind it. Not to troll. And the fact they think that this is somehow anything more than complete conspiratorial nonsense, is incredibly telling of them as a person.
For the sake of honesty: I will admit this is an alt account, to keep a porn stuff separate from non-porn stuff, but I may keep my other identity and open secret at best, because I realized for various reasons that keeping it a secret is not that good of an idea, especially since I've always known it would be figured out eventually.
SpoonFox has seemingly blocked me, as I cannot respond to any of their comments. Note how they reply
Turns out this lad is likely someone's rightwing sock puppet who wants to grab gotchas out of you. Look below at how I triggered him over the word "Patriarchal".
Turns out this lad is likely someone's rightwing sock puppet who wants to grab gotchas out of you. L
