Welcome to Inkbunny...

To view member-only content, create an account. ( Hide )

How does Ink Bunny deal with "human-like" Aliens?

I've actually been curious about this.
In the future I'd want to do lewd content of this character:

Juice Girl and Friends [Page 2] by PantyRanger

But she might be sufficiently too human-like for Ink Bunny.
She's part of a species of aliens called "Star Elves".
To be safe, I may censor work of this character and post the work to baraag.

Viewed:	61 times
Added:	4 days, 1 hr ago 20 Mar 2025 03:56 CET
Commenting Locked

9 Comments on this Journal

Leave a Comment...

StupidSquirrel

4 days, 1 hr ago

link

It's generally safe to say if it's not based on an animal or covered in fur, it's not allowed. Things like orcs and elves and fantasy races like that all seem to be considered human for the rules here

PantyRanger

4 days, 1 hr ago

link

@ StupidSquirrel

Yeah. Sounds about right

DownThePipes

4 days, 1 hr ago

link

It depends heavily on the stylization

terrenski

4 days, 1 hr ago

link

As long as it has appendages no human being has is ok than just skin colors.
Just say have no large human skin , must have animal parts n stuff is ok.
No 100%human with animal ear&Tail or small furpatch.
Simply No Kemonomimi yes to werewolf.
Check on Twitter or Bluesky for "Kroox" for the best alien reference.

sillylilfoxcub

4 days, 1 hr ago

link

Edited 4 days, 1 hr ago by Owner

That doesn't even look like a REAL HUMAN, that looks like a purple dark elf or something. That looks like somebody's anime style drawing of their DND Character. It looks nothing at all like a Real Human Person.

"recognizable as an actual person"

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256

.

https://www.justice.gov/osg/brief/ashcroft-v-free-speec...

.

"But she might be sufficiently too human-like for Ink Bunny."

True, perhaps. But the American Legal System doesn't really consider that to be "an image of a real person" or "indistinguishable from a real person."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paVX3OfLoLE

.

390X

4 days ago

link

Edited 4 days ago by Owner

Hi PantyRanger,
The relevant part of our ACP would be > https://wiki.inkbunny.net/wiki/ACP#Human_Characters

"	Characters that are essentially human (pixies, faeries, elves, orcs, trolls, etc) or just have ears/tails or other superficial animal features applied are considered human for this rule.

I'm afraid that, in my opinion, I would consider the character you linked to in your post above to be sufficiently "Human-like" to fall foul of this rule.

Hope this cleared things up

(edit)
Yes, your decision to censor or crop adult-rated images of this character and link them off-site is permitted.
Just make sure that the cropped or censored image "plausibly depict(s) a non-sexual situation".

PantyRanger

4 days ago

link

@ 390X

Okay. Thank you.

billmurray

3 days, 23 hrs ago

link

I'd say that if the skin color is not a normal human skin color and it has different ears (and maybe nose) it's probably okay..... but I did have a (censored, but naughty) elf pic with mocha skin nuked recently after being up for many years, so who knows @w@

PantyRanger

3 days, 15 hrs ago

link

@ billmurray

I guess it's human enough for that to matter. I got my answer above with this.

"	Characters that are essentially human (pixies, faeries, elves, orcs, trolls, etc) or just have ears/tails or other superficial animal features applied are considered human for this rule.

New Comment:

Move reply box to top ↑

Log in or create an account to comment.

Help

Information

Policy & Legal

All artwork and other content is copyright its respective owners.

Powered by Harmony 'Gravitation' Release 80.

Content Server: Virginia Cache - provided by Inkbunny Donors. Background: Blank Gray.

The Inkbunny web application, artwork, name and logo are copyright and trademark of their respective owners.