Welcome to Inkbunny...
Allowed ratings
To view member-only content, create an account. ( Hide )
PoorSal

some thoughts on Ratatouille

This my first time watching it in probably 10-15 years! There was so much going on! WOW.

The characters were so good! The main characters felt very well flushed out. They interplanetary off each other so well. The cinematography was great during the kitchen scenes and over Paris.

There were some things I didn't like (the kiss scene, the last 5 minutes feels like truncated part of 20 minutes worth of important story, some of the narration is excessive (I also hate first person narrators in stories that don't use it for anything), Bechtel test flunking, there are straight up mistakes in the script,  seemingly justifying false arrest, and the fumbling of the anyone can cook thesis .

I loved the conflicting ideologies of the characters and how they highlight each others strengths and weaknesses. I disagree with a lot of what Remy was about, which makes the resolution praising him hard to swallow. I think it represents a flaw in common theological thinking. The movie was perfectly fine showing Remy to be wrong about the dangers of rat-hood earlier in the movie, but it is forgotten about and suddenly doesn't become important again later.

 There should have been a longer kitchen scene at the end. We must see the rats cook more! The human cooking was filmed with such tension; the ease in which the rats could cook felt patronizing considering how difficult the human cooks had it! That also makes the "exciting climax" not exciting! I want to see those rats sweat! And i want to see them rewarded for hard work, and not be subject to extermination or any form of subjugation. (Ratatouille 2 would have been wild if they made it.) They should have found room while the critic was waiting to have more cooking tension. Linguine should have served his own dish! The climax of this action scene should have been placed elsewhere so that other plot threads could have been addressed.

One thing could have saved the only female charater of this movie-- Linguine isn't Gusteau's son. Collette forged the documents to oust the chef because no one liked him. It would have given her something yo do besides being a fuck prize to one of the most sex-less characters I have ever seen. It would have contributed to the movies themes of not following unjust laws.

Ahhh! This movie has so many enticing ideas, but the execution is often not to my liking! There was a lot to like, though. I look forward to watching it again and having another big think!
Viewed: 43 times
Added: 1 month ago
 
HiddenLurk3r
1 month ago
It'll never happen, but I've always wanted a prequel showing Ego's journey. How did he go from a simple country boy to a famous critic? What happened that made him so jaded? What was the big confrontation with Gusteau like? I'm probably the only one that cares though.
PoorSal
1 month ago
Hehe! Ego, I think, works great as an important secondary character, but I understand the fascination with him! I think the fact that we know so little about him is what makes him so fascinating.
shaemint
1 month ago
i just saw it same-day lol
PoorSal
1 month ago
Woah! It is like we watched it together! OwO
otaking3582
1 month ago
Ego's speech at the end has really stuck with me all these years later, although probably not for the reasons the filmmakers intended. "'Anyone can cook' doesn't mean ' everyone is capable of cooking', it means that people shouldn't be dismissive of one's abilities due to their backgrounds." I've always thought more about the former part of that statement, since it's a sad but true fact of life. Sometimes, no matter how much someone practices or has great teachers like Linguine did, they won't be good at a particular skill due to factors outside of their control.
Michael Jordan could never be as good at baseball as he was in basketball.
Chris Pratt can only voice characters that sound like Chris Pratt.
Adam Sandler is incapable of being funny.

I'm probably never gonna be good at drawing, or at least not good at drawing anything from my imagination, and a lot of other creative endeavors I'd like to try would require money.

I'm rambling, what were we talking about?
PoorSal
1 month ago
Ah, see, that is what irked me! As great as the monologue is, the idea that not everyone can become a competent cook I just flat out reject.

Sure, many people have innate skills in certain fields that make things easier on them. It is unlikely that someone without technical prowess naturally can rise to the level as these people, but skills are learned. You can learn to draw. You can learn to cook. You can learn to do most anything another person can do, assuming you aren't disabled in a way that makes the task impossible or its related to physical characteristics. It might be hard and take a long time, but skills are learned. You might not be able to become a great cook no matter how hard you try, but anyone with the correct resources to learn can become a competent one.

I mean, Linguine is never even taught how to cook in the movie. The training montage was about Remy learning to control Linguine. Linguine was blindfolded the entire time! We are never given the reason to believe Linguine cannot learn. This idea that "Anyone can Cook" is a trick that doesn't actually mean what the words say is bullshit and comes out of nowhere. If 300 rats can learn to cook as well as a dozen well trained chefs in ten minutes, than I'd say anyone can cook. Ego doesn't know what he is talking about, because the rest of the movie does not support that part of his speech.

You can also read Ego's monologue (or the section in question) as being about not everyone can become a artist because of lack of dedication. I think that is a better message that is both true and fits the story more. Hell, you don't even have to change the script, you just have to use a less popular reading of the text :P
New Comment:
Move reply box to top
Log in or create an account to comment.