Depictions of humans having sex is a real issue both legally and from a money-transfer point of view. For example, a country could say "oh, so are all the models drawn on your site over 18? Can you prove it?" Then there's things like promotion of bestiality, or indecency.
Bottom line - we are worried that it will cause problems. Inkbunny does not want to end up on any national blocklists, or get its users or administrators in trouble. Sticking to furry characters avoids most of these, because few people care what animals do to one another.
Depictions of humans having sex is a real issue both legally and from a money-transfer point of view
Depends how human they look! "Human" includes "characters that are essentially human (pixies, faeries, elves, orcs, trolls, etc) or just have ears/tails or other superficial animal features applied." If they are beyond this, they are not human.
Depends how human they look! "Human" includes "characters that are essentially human (pixies, faerie
naga's are those creatures that have the hips to head top human, but the lower half is pure anacanda'ish snake *noddlies*
i mean, he's far demon then human but... theres that upper half, idk, i jush kinda find it hard to understand when cub porn is allowed but human isn't x3
not saying either are wrong, but... just extremely confused on it o.o
naga's are those creatures that have the hips to head top human, but the lower half is pure anacanda
it's a complete human top, just with demon naga horns on the head aswell as elvan ears. *nods* and what about just nude humans that aren't in a sexual possition?
it's a complete human top, just with demon naga horns on the head aswell as elvan ears. *nods* and w
This is dumb. Its a friggin drawing, its not a real person. And if indecency is such an issue with this then why are people allowed to post furrys taking a dump in eachother's mouths but not two characters making love? Psh. this is dumbbbbb.
This is dumb. Its a friggin drawing, its not a real person. And if indecency is such an issue with t
