Oh, I have, but they're not as creepy, probably because they just seem sad. Left to rot and be torn apart for parts. Sure you see more of their parts, but I find that sad, not creepy.
Oh, I have, but they're not as creepy, probably because they just seem sad. Left to rot and be torn
You're right, them being easier doesn't make them less creepy, but as I said before "they're not as creepy, probably because they just seem sad. Left to rot and be torn apart for parts. Sure you see more of their parts, but I find that sad, not creepy."
You're right, them being easier doesn't make them less creepy, but as I said before "they're not as
How could it be a prequel? They seem to reference the first game directly, they talk about how these redesigned characters are new and the old ones (from the first game) are being junked, etc. It seems very heavily telegraphed that it's a sequel, not a prequel.
How could it be a prequel? They seem to reference the first game directly, they talk about how these
Yes, and that's a clever ploy by Scott Cawthon, but he did a very good job subtly telling us that it's actually a prequel.
*Spoiler Alert*
In FNAF 2, when you beat the fifth night you are rewarded with a check, but this time it is different. Not just the payment, but the date is actually revealed: 11/12/1987. Weird, right? Well, come Night 6 you get a call from Phone Guy (who we assumed died in the first game) saying several things, one of them is "Uh we have one more event scheduled for tomorrow, a birthday. (Possibly the same event the 'Bite of '87' takes place.) You’ll be on day shift, wear your uniform, stay close to the animatronics, make sure they don’t hurt anyone okay, uh for now just make it through the night, uh when the place eventually opens again I’ll probably take the night shift myself". This also shows that phone guy (during FNAF2) has not yet to take the night shift, but in the first one he said he worked there before Mike.
But there's a lot more, such as mentioning that the building is on lock down, probably because it's under investigation. He mentions that no one is allowed in or out especially old employees, then talks about 'previous employees', someone 'using one of the suits' and stuff. This is all referencing to the kids disappearance, and the Bite of '87. And there's so much more, but I don't want to drown out Atryl's page with so much comments. Sorry, btw, sorry!
But, you know what all of this really means, right? Five Nights at Freddy's 3 is more than likely on it's way. >3
Yes, and that's a clever ploy by Scott Cawthon, but he did a very good job subtly telling us that it
Yes, I just discovered that a few hours ago, and was completely blown away. Even to find out there was another building before the older one on top of that! There's so much more story being thrown around that it's blowing my mind!
Yes, I just discovered that a few hours ago, and was completely blown away. Even to find out there w
This may just be because I'm all about technology and engineering, but to see more of the exoskeleton exposed isn't creepy to me because I know that's there. It's just simply covered up, but having this joyful and happy 'cute' rabbit trying to stuff you into a suit is a lot creepier to me than a skeleton like creature in rotting remains try to stuff me in a suit. One is creepier, while the other is more 'horrifying'.
Honestly, check out Vsauce's video on "What is creepy?" video. It's a really good watch, and really informative, defenitely sets out what is creepy versus scary versus horrifying.
This may just be because I'm all about technology and engineering, but to see more of the exoskeleto
They aren´t supposed to be scary, they are supposed to be kid friendly.Which in turn makes it even more FREAKY when something that is supposed to be kid friendly starts stalking you and ends up killing you
They aren´t supposed to be scary, they are supposed to be kid friendly.Which in turn makes it even m
Chica looks more like a skank than kid friendly. The game dev should have never made chica that way. The original design was more kid friendly that what we see now.
Chica looks more like a skank than kid friendly. The game dev should have never made chica that way.
Actually, Scott Cawthon did a fantastic job with their designs, including Chica. In the late 80's most animatronics where seeing a design overall because of the shift in technology, and from the sounds of Freddy Fazbear Pizzeria, they're a little behind on the ball. And making Chica more like a 'skank' would have really happened to show off that Chica is a female, where as the rest are males. That actually was a thing back in the early 90's.
Actually, Scott Cawthon did a fantastic job with their designs, including Chica. In the late 80's mo
Sorry but all you do is complain about the game on every post. Turn to the devs and tell them, I'm pretty sure they received comments like this, but the positive feedback wins over the few complains.
Also watch your language please, you guys shouldn't insult each other, or if you can't hold it in, please do it in private messages, these messages pop up on my message board and I don't like them.
Hope it's alright :)
Sorry but all you do is complain about the game on every post. Turn to the devs and tell them, I'm p
What's really creepy is that this isn't far off from the actual character design. Hot pants and a curved chest covered by a bib is cool for a children's restaurant?
Picture is great though.
What's really creepy is that this isn't far off from the actual character design. Hot pants and a c
I kind of feel like hot pants and birdie boobies wasn't necessary to get that across in the context of a children's themed restaurant. Though I am enjoying all the fan art that's coming out of this.
I kind of feel like hot pants and birdie boobies wasn't necessary to get that across in the context
Honestly i disagree. Sure this Chicka looks allot more kid friendly BUT if you see something that isn´t originally meant to be scary and is kid friendly suddenly start moving,stalking you and ends up killing you doesn´t that make it even more freaky and scary?Does IMO
Honestly i disagree. Sure this Chicka looks allot more kid friendly BUT if you see something that is
yes it does make her less scary but maybe THAT WAS THE POINT considering that Toy Chica isn't gonna kill you by stuffing into animatronic costume Original Chica yeah the new characters aren't all that scary but that makes you fear the old ones more
yes it does make her less scary but maybe THAT WAS THE POINT considering that Toy Chica isn't gonna
According to some sources, FNAF 2 is supposed to be a prequel or something so maybe these were earlier designs and we get to relive the olden days of the restaurant.
According to some sources, FNAF 2 is supposed to be a prequel or something so maybe these were earli
