lol I'm sorry but that description made me giggle. so does that mean the finally allow naked cubs/foals/lolis hehe. I mean ya did say they don't wear them there.
lol I'm sorry but that description made me giggle. so does that mean the finally allow naked cubs/fo
Pretty sure he just means that adding underwear to ponies makes them suggestive or NSFW rather than SFW. So without the panties, this would just be an adorable pic of Scootaloo looking over her shoulder. With, you have this.
Pretty sure he just means that adding underwear to ponies makes them suggestive or NSFW rather than
Mostly, it's that it doesn't matter, or rather, that it shouldn't. But it's an arbitrary, random matter of perspective outside of any realm of reason. It's like 'if this arouses the right people, it's pornography, otherwise it's completely innocent!'
Mostly, it's that it doesn't matter, or rather, that it shouldn't. But it's an arbitrary, random mat
I don't know. It's very arbitrary. Part of it depends on speculating on what some other person - one who knows nothing, naturally - would think. It's the entire air of being a slave to someone else's moral policing that bugs me. I've never been bothered by genuine art directives.
I don't know. It's very arbitrary. Part of it depends on speculating on what some other person - one
The hardest part is that the strip of rainbow in the middle is really small. Kinda hard to see if you have a small screen, or not very good eyes (like me). I actually didn't see it the first couple times I saw the pic.
The hardest part is that the strip of rainbow in the middle is really small. Kinda hard to see if y
