Well, the front of the ship is a bit out of shape, the perspective is a bit off at some points, and I probably miss some other problems. But the image itself looks good, so, well done. :)
Well, the front of the ship is a bit out of shape, the perspective is a bit off at some points, and
Hmmm, I would disagree on some point. Well, I agree with the fact that no piece of art will ever be perfect (and to my mind, perfection shouldn't be a goal in the process of artistic creation from an artistic point of view). However, on a technical point of view, I think that the artist should master his tools. Without becoming a living god in his field, to my mind, perspectives problems (for example) should be corrected.
I am not looking after a brush stroke too hard on the edge of the bench in the background of a painting. On this point, I agree that imperfection is an added value, because only this artist would have done it like that, and it define (and is defined by ) his own style, and has such, can't be qualified of "mistake". However, that's not the case with perspectives problems. You either stick to realistic perspective, or you make it your own. Thinking about this, I come to this conclusion :
The style of an artist is defined by what he is able to make his own. You start by enhancing your skills and stick to mastering tools on a technical point of view. Once it's done, you can start playing with it and modifying the rules, adding an artistic value. But as long as you are trying to master a tool, modification are barely mistakes.
A pic technically "perfect" but with no appropriation by the artist has poor artistic value, but a pic artistically "perfect" is not, and will never be, depraved from technical value.
Once again, the image is great, on a technical point of view and on an artistic point of view. :)
Hmmm, I would disagree on some point. Well, I agree with the fact that no piece of art will ever be
