but you see it isn't cheating its using what you got to your advantage. cheating would be using a sonic rainboom to shatter all the walls, now my method yeah its cheating but effective ^^
but you see it isn't cheating its using what you got to your advantage. cheating would be using a so
I once wrote a computer game where a random maze is drawn and then the screen blacked out, obliguing you to rely on memory to navigate in the dark. No, wait, you have matches*, a limited supply of matches to illume your vicinity. Hitting a wall kills you, and you must restart. You score backwards: Each moment you spend in navigating the maze adds to it., and you had to win through the maze in less time than the lo-score showed. You must reach the exit to win. I think unused matches are tallied in the score -but I am now not sure: it was written for the Apple ][ , a computer Bill Gates declared "obsolete" and shut down production & repairs on it. Mine quit on me in 1996 -or so. Kill Bill Gates.
I miss my games. Kill Bill Gates. At my age, I no longer have the brain power to write them anew.
* The matches would go out after a set time, and you would have to rely on memory for a bit. You could key the command to strike a new match -at any time & as long as there were matches left !
I once wrote a computer game where a random maze is drawn and then the screen blacked out, obliguing
