There are three different reasons to oppose AI-generated images.
1) The petit-bourgeois reason: small-time artists make their hay selling the same kind of mindless images of characters in provocative poses that AI makes better and faster than they do. Not only does this undermine their own prices, but it calls into question whether what they create is even "art" at all if a machine can effectively do what they do.
2) The bourgeois reason: AI is stupid-easy to generate and free (KILL IT! KILL IT WITH FIRE!) to produce which allows any and every potential customer out there to create his own entertainment and entertainment for others. Obviously, that is bad for business.
3) The proletarian reason: a whole lot of dumb schmucks have spent so long sucking up to the small-time artists that they feel a moral obligation to talk up whatever may seem to confirm their specialness, even when it obviously runs contrary to their own interests.
There are three different reasons to oppose AI-generated images. 1) The petit-bourgeois reason: s
You seem to have a clear lack of understanding about how the technology works and how models are trained (as your first point, “AI is better and faster than humans,” illustrates). Also, if you think generating images is free just because you are not paying money to use these models right now, then I don't know what to tell you other than please learn more about how these things work.
Doing some research on the topic and forming better arguments for your points would do you good.
You seem to have a clear lack of understanding about how the technology works and how models are tra
