It is way more fun for me, because, when you are using LMMS, people expect you to do a lot synthesis. I always use the same synthesis tricks and prefer to focus on the composition. You don't synthesize in Protracker, you work with pre-rendered samples instead. Provided I find samples that sound good, I only need to care about the composition, not about the synthesis of instruments. I like that much better. Sure, I could do it on LMMS, but having a complete digital audio workstation and deliberately not use 95% of its capabilities feels like a huge waste to me. That's also the reason why I ditched Furnace: too many things, too many options and it was aggravated by each chip's individual limitations to keep track of.
It is way more fun for me, because, when you are using LMMS, people expect you to do a lot synthesis
I see. It sounds good for you, then. I look forward to hearing you produce some music that reflects that fulfillment. I'm not sure it'd work for me since composition is my weak skill.
I see. It sounds good for you, then. I look forward to hearing you produce some music that reflect
That's..fair. Maybe I should say I lack comfort and familiarity to seriously pursue such a thing as jamming, as well as finding myself unable to practice in a satisfactory manner right now. Hopefully not long term.
That's..fair. Maybe I should say I lack comfort and familiarity to seriously pursue such a thing as
The sound of Protracker depends a lot on what samples you are using. These that I used are quite high-quality.~ Plus, the clone for Ubuntu allows me to import samples in WAV format, provided I accept to downsample them into 22 kHz (otherwise, they would not play in the Amiga). But a good sample, even after downsampled, can sound clear.
The sound of Protracker depends a lot on what samples you are using. These that I used are quite hig
