but when in reality all we apply our judgement to the work of others, watching the latest page on inkbunny, for example, we decide who really deserve our support, to be watched, commented, liked, ecc.
who / what we care for and who / what can be ignored.
i wrote «5%» in my post, meaning that there is a 95% (or whatever is the % is, all we have different standards) of people that i have in reality no interest to give my support as an artist
obviously, you have ALL THE RIGHTS to have your rules, your preferred artists (your is a splendid choice)
to watch, your likes, to comment other people, to think that i am a dick, and ignore me; i still think that is a difference between «need» and «deserve» appreciation as an artist, something that always pass through our tastes, preferences, ecc...
sincerely, all the best.
«in theory», as an astract rule of thumb, but when in reality all we apply our judgement to the wo
That's perfectly fine, just make it clear (as you have) that this is your opinion. And I'll state here that, in my opinion, if you're trying, I applaud you putting in effort as an artist, whoever you are. I may not pledge money or buy work, I may not even Watch, but I'm still glad for everyone who's making effort to improve and remembering to keep humility.
That's perfectly fine, just make it clear (as you have) that this is your opinion. And I'll state he
