People think that cancel culture-style approach works when fighting against scientific progress. Recently they've had some success with deplatforming the more open projects, so I assume this image is related to that.
People think that cancel culture-style approach works when fighting against scientific progress. Rec
As the way AI art is right now, it has set up itself for failure,Liek there is a reason why AI "art" cannot be sold, and its grifted as a rental software service
When you look at the legal disclaimer its basically the same as the Collage legal disclaimer, but without the Transformative property, Thats is the one that allow you to claim a work as your own or use it as you like and grants you legal protection if you try to sell it. In order for AI art to comply with it,it has to stop using the Randomwalk-chain, the innate art-style from the artist you feed to it, and make its very own, totally unrelated thing. its just not the way they are coded. Mathematically the only way I foresee that happening is if the programs glitches hard enough while being struck by cosmic rays. Turn out that luck is the most transformative thing ever.
While the rental model Allows developers to transfer all the legal troubles of AI art to the end user that they would never had to deal with if they had contracted a real artist. It's basically an Scam
It has no real use cases scenarios, well unless you really like weighted Random, in that case I would recommend to just grab a Fractal Art generator from source forge and make a lot of psychedelic tentacles. As a comparison. When Mandelbrot figured how to make computer plot fractals , people actually liked their look, and he became a sort of genius pop celebrity and nobody contested whether Fractal were an art form, When AI art started most found it silly looking and it quickly became riddled with drama and controversy
As the way AI art is right now, it has set up itself for failure,Liek there is a reason why AI "art
Pure single iteration "text to image" images are unlikely to be copyrightable, but an image with 100 inpainting steps and manual brush strokes likely is. The exact point between them is yet to be decided in courts.
Pure single iteration "text to image" images are unlikely to be copyrightable, but an image with 100
