Welcome to Inkbunny...
Allowed ratings
To view member-only content, create an account. ( Hide )
[TOO SPICY FOR FURAFFINITY] WHITE PRIVILEGE
« older newer »
ASSIGNED FAIL

Medium (920px wide max)
Wide - use max window width - scroll to see page ⇅
Fit all of image in window
set default image size: small | medium | wide
Download (new tab)
page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
[TOO SPICY FOR FURAFFINITY] WHITE PRIVILEGE
ASSIGNED FAIL
+3
[TOO SPICY FOR FURAFFINITY] WHITE PRIVILEGE
ASSIGNED FAIL
+3
Show 1 More Pool...
[TOO SPICY FOR FURAFFINITY] WHITE PRIVILEGE
ASSIGNED FAIL
+3
Featuring the return of Grug! Grug is my favorite minor variant of the NPC template I use in my comics. There are some reasons for this.
1. I've always liked  writing characters who speak in broken English
2. He's physically fit
3. Because Neanderthals have bigger brains than normal humans, I can make fun of him being stupid while pointing out his squandered potential because he could put that big brain to better use

But yes, there are literally two options in a sane world. Call yourself a free speech platform (not liable for what is posted on your site, you can't restrict users' messages) or call yourself a publisher (you have veto and editorial power over what is posted, but you're also responsible for everything that's posted).

Almost every media company right now gets away with stealing the beneficial side of both and facing no consequences.

Keywords
male 1,179,617, transgender 16,298, stoat 2,294, ermine 845, transgender female 725, satire 476, politics 472, political 259, npc 194, caveman 125, political comic 50, neanderthal 25
Details
Type: Comic
Published: 3 years, 10 months ago
Rating: Mature

MD5 Hash for Page 1... Show Find Identical Posts [?]
Stats
52 views
4 favorites
2 comments

BBCode Tags Show [?]
 
DiogenesShandor
3 years, 4 months ago
I disagree. There's only ONE sane option which is to be a free speech platform. Publishers and censorship are obsolete relics of the pre-digital era.
UnstableSable
3 years, 2 months ago
I was saying what the only two legal options were, not what the morally good option was. Legally, private companies like Twitter, Google, and Facebook have a right to act as publishers if they in turn accept the limitations and accountability of being publishers. The system as it currently stands allows them to reap the benefits of both sides simultaneously, and that's what I'm complaining about here, even knowing I'm only screaming into the wind and nothing will be done about it.
New Comment:
Move reply box to top
Log in or create an account to comment.