Faya addresses a question that I tend to see a lot of in the furry fandom; specifically, the kind of question that tends to be something on the lines of "How come this is okay, but this isn't?" To illustrate what I'm talking about, I'll use Faya here.
Now, if I were to say that Faya was a vixen that was about seven feet tall, had four perfectly functioning arms and was also in possession of incredible magical talent, then many of you would not only say that that was completely believable; but also flawlessly logical. However, the moment I say that Faya's breasts also vary in size on a daily basis (sometimes growing as large as beach balls), then you'd say that that would be completely unrealistic.
Now seriously, the girl is seven feet tall, has four arms, and can obliterate a city block at a moments notice. How is that even remotely realistic?
And by the way, this doesn't just apply to fetish art either. I noticed that people will start complaining about a character's bustline, even if the character's breasts are like a G-cup. Granted, G-cup sized breasts are mildly rare and can be cumbersome to some women; but it's a cup size that does exist in real life and some women do naturally have breasts that large (and even enjoy them).
So I guess my question is, "why is a character that's part rabbit, part fox, part dragon, and part god-knows-what-else, has purple fur, can fly (without the use of wings), and can shoot lasers out of her eyes, considered a realistic character; but the moment you give her breasts larger than a D-cup, she becomes completely 'unanchored' in the real world?" I'm sorry, but where's the logic in that? O_o
