"The NeoEnlightenment is a movement that stands, above all, for the principles of the original Enlightenment movement; liberty, equality, and brotherhood of mankind. We emerged as a small group dedicated not in spreading hate or providing an ideological purity in the world, but instead promoting democratic values and unity at a time when groups such as the alt-right and other reactionary populist forces stand as a threat to liberal democracy and pluralistic values. Hatred and fear are powerful tools that have been used to divide people, but we hope that with a united effort knowledge and understanding can win out over them. Our group is definitely not perfect, but we hope to help foster an environment that can grow even larger."
I'm sure 'Truth isn't Truth' is about to become a phrase you hear too much too, if you keep up with news. And that should tell you exactly why I said what I said and believe what I do.
I'm sure 'Truth isn't Truth' is about to become a phrase you hear too much too, if you keep up with
"Humanity, and possibly every possible intelligent life out there, loves to think themselves as the hero. Actions which guilt does not touch is thus justified in their eyes, yet this justification is merely a way to hide selfish endeavors. For with unity comes the selfish desire of safety at the expense of freedom. With freedom, the selfish desire for choice comes at the expense of unity. It is thus that these two forces are always in constant conflict with one another, as one is the force of order and dictatorship, while the other is the force of chaos and expression. It is from this conflict that arises ideals, and justification for said ideals. And as long as two man exist at the same time, one will always find evil in the other."
"Humanity, and possibly every possible intelligent life out there, loves to think themselves as the
Which is exactly why we need to ensure the continuity of pluralism. Its only by having no definite absolute rigid unchanging truth that we can continue to move forward and change. Once you've accepted a hardline that you believe is the best of all possible ways without any need for compromise or adaptability you've already doomed yourself to stagnation.
Which is exactly why we need to ensure the continuity of pluralism. Its only by having no definite a
