Welcome to Inkbunny...
Allowed ratings
To view member-only content, block by keyword, comment or upload, create an account. ( Hide )
Is this the definition of an echo chamber?
« older newer »
FURRY RAIDERS - United against hate

Medium (920px wide max)
Wide - use max window width - scroll to see page ⇅
Fit all of image in window
set default image size: small | medium | wide
Download (new tab)
Lets play a game everyone.

This game is called: DISCRIMINATION - WHO DID IT BETTER?

So. This is about the above.

If you are judging a group based upon propaganda, and not logic/reason/evidence. And then discriminating against said group purely based upon the feelings you have reacting to said propaganda... who are you acting like?

And, out of the two options presented above. Who did the discrimination of the group better?

Keywords
assigned furry 143,502, twitter 1,430, people 470, hate 374, jewish 168, raider 146, jew 88, raiders 33, tweet 31, discrimination 26, jews 17, exclusion 4, discriminate 1
Details
Type: Picture/Pinup
Published: 9 years ago
Rating: General

MD5 Hash for Page 1... Show Find Identical Posts [?]
Stats
103 views
4 favorites
3 comments

BBCode Tags Show [?]
 
Maulkin
9 years ago
Who did it best? Well, the Nazis were the most effective, and didn't pussyfoot around like Antifa does... So, I guess the Nazis did it 'best' (ie, most effectively), though Antifa has the same sort of spirit behind it.
Enjambre
9 years ago
At least Nazis are brave enough to admit they are bigoted and hateful. I can't say the same for ISIS-tifa.
ZeloxQuo
9 years ago
Alrighty!

One vote for Nazis. Can understand your reasoning. Though in this instance, it isn't literal Nazis from the 1930s. It is someone with some neo-nazi beliefs who hasn't acted on them.

Tried to make the comparison as similar as possible when it comes to motivation to see how people would vote.

Thank you for the comment.  : 3
New Comment:
Move reply box to top ↑
Log in or create an account to comment.