I like the,wayback.machine. theres countlrss websitescthat have been - justcdisappeared - the company had new owners and they took the old site offline -the owners had "relaunch" and the important stuff fell victim.to enshitification
This also affects many sites that had art or stories. Withoutvthe,archive theyd be lost forever. whenni.need to.put links on written (printed) work that cant be changed afterwards, for that reason I usually make snapshots/deep links using the wayback machine. It ensures that if someone clicks that link ten years from now it still leads somewhere.
By cutting your content off from the wayback machine it basically means if IB burns your stuff will be lost forever.
yes if you put stuff online that shouldnt be online and it gets,archived then you have a problem. But thats no reason to go and burn libraries.
I like the,wayback.machine. theres countlrss websitescthat have been - justcdisappeared - the compan
I'm all for making the job for future internet archeologists easier and more rewarding. However, aside from being a fetish artist, I am also a real person, with a duty to my family and myself. In a world where anyone could and would use my internet history against me, whiting out a single entry in a ledger of a library containing a trillion books seems one of my lesser crimes.
I'm all for making the job for future internet archeologists easier and more rewarding. However, asi
If theres legitimate reason to do so, then you have no choice. My worry is that this "lets block the archive" seems to become kind of a meme. And thats not good.
If theres legitimate reason to do so, then you have no choice. My worry is that this "lets block the