I don't agree with the transphobic opinions of the site owner, but I won't be leaving this site until I have to leave for whatever reason. Not because I'm in favor of transphobia, absolutely not, I have trans friends and, to be real, I am honestly unsure about my own identity.
The owner definitely needs to be called out for ignoring and/or enabling harassment, and hopefully they get the hint. Letting people harass individuals on your site just because of a petty opinion is immature and downright shameful.
The reason I will continue to post here as long as I can is that this is one of the last art gallery sites where I can post what I want to draw without breaking some kind of rule or guideline. The other currently being Pixiv, and I might look into e621. You may have noticed I bolded those words. I will not be using BlueSky or Twitter as art gallery sites, that's not what they're for, and are very user unfriendly in my opinion.
Anyway, if somehow I get banned or something, my Trello has links to all my sites I post to. If I get targeted for harassment, I will use the block button and report as much as I can.
Oh, and here's a BlueSky post exposing all this stuff so you don't have to dig for proof like I had to. https://bsky.app/profile/echoen.bsky.social/post/3lm2cr... Oh, and to anyone reading this, please provide solid evidence of your accusations, I was about to dismiss this as Twitter people being cancel-happy recreationally offended crybullies again.
Agreed. I'm not a transphobe, nor do I agree with it, but this is just a place to put my art on. Besides, the owner being transphobic is not the only problem this site has.
Agreed. I'm not a transphobe, nor do I agree with it, but this is just a place to put my art on. Bes
What are the other issues, aside from the cub content? If I'm gonna be honest, I see it as a sort of "necessary evil." Yeah, it's uncomfortable to look at or acknowledge, but for real, it's just fiction and the blacklist feature exists. And if this site did ban cub content, then who's to say it won't devolve into FA's 2.7 policy all over again. The only reason I decided to start posting here in the first place is because I knew I could post weird diaper content without getting banned for it.
Also, NSFW cub isn't only an InkBunny issue, it's on Twitter, BlueSky, Pixiv, e621, and Rule34 as well. Just people like to pretend IB is the only one doing it.
What are the other issues, aside from the cub content? If I'm gonna be honest, I see it as a sort of
True, and as weird as it is, I'm not gonna stifle another artist's work, even if the content itself is unsavory and possibly disturbing. Art is art, and so long as the artist themselves aren't acting out in a similar fashion to their art, it's fine. Also, yeah, I know this isn't the only site that does it.
True, and as weird as it is, I'm not gonna stifle another artist's work, even if the content itself
I say stick around, even if it's in protest. And if they ignore harassment reports, make a big stink about it and make it public. That's how I'm going about it, anyway.
I say stick around, even if it's in protest. And if they ignore harassment reports, make a big stink
Fa is the most hypocrite furry website I know. Owner of FA say diaper fetish is bad because is an cp kink, but it's just an false flag to ban diaper fetish because a lot of fa user dislike diaper because it's gross. But it's the same peoples that like gross nsfw cub. I prefert to watch diapered pokemon or really cute cub that bad drawing or really human shape furry in hardcore sexual situation. Inkbunny is the last website that diaper fetish can put diaper stuff without risk. For ai content, I feel all furry website begin to be more and more strict about ia. Like we must rarely post ai art and ai art in good quality with specific paid site ai like stable diffusion. None free ai picture website is allowed at all I think. I am scared that full of picture and even user and artist are deleted, lost and ban from a lot of furry website because they are too much art, epecially bad art, too much ai, toxic user and artist ect. Only the best of the best risk to be allowed in some years.
Fa is the most hypocrite furry website I know. Owner of FA say diaper fetish is bad because is an cp
TBH, I don't hate AI, as long as it's properly tagged, not flooding and overpopulating, looks decent, and not taking jobs and money or being charged money to generate. I think IB handles AI pretty decently. If it is only allowing paid AI programs, then that honestly sucks. But this isn't about AI.
TBH, I don't hate AI, as long as it's properly tagged, not flooding and overpopulating, looks decen
Me too. I like perchance because i found a way to create super nsfw content that compete with some best artist. Artist should adapte to use sometime ai, like craftman in old day was oblige to use factory. But artiste must be able to do manual art even if they do ai art. We musen't lost ancestral technical and not abuse of technoli0gie.
Me too. I like perchance because i found a way to create super nsfw content that compete with some b
Some of it comes from mixing sex with gender (scientifically they're different constructs), some from a simple intolerance from those who are different and that can be for many reasons. Some from the endless back and forth that has ruined it for all.
It is many things.
Some of it comes from mixing sex with gender (scientifically they're different constructs), some fro
