Is it possible that the smartest people in this whole thing we call life, or existence, are just *destined* to be the ones with the roughest cut?
Thing is I'm just starting out doing my thing, and starting out only on IB too, IMMEDIATELY, almost, shit goes awry. Not making some kind of existential claim about how smart I am here, I just look at signs in my life to guide me. I believe in karma, I believe in multiple realities, reincarnation, numerology, astrology and a higher power programming and controlling this whole existence, That said, I still question whether fate, and revenge should be considered to be part of that.
If we're able to manifest an ideal life, I just why do we get slowed down, like when all your posts all across a platform get taken down because they KEEP CHANGING THE RULES?
You're an independent site... you wanna be forebearers of policy?? Don't allow underage content!!! Leave it for the dark web. You'' be starting anew basically and completely rebranding, but really, if you want people to take you seriously as a place to host and post content, you gotta get your act together and make your rules concise. It's honestly annoying, but fair is fair in my case. I just heard it from someone else.
Then I asked AI to cross-reference an archived version of the acp from september last year to the current, here's what it gave me:
I'll help you cross-reference and identify discrepancies between the two pages.
First, I'll summarize the main points from the original text you provided:
**Original Text Summary**
* The Acceptable Content Policy (ACP) is part of the overall Terms of Service.
* Content rules include:
+ Ownership: Artwork must be created by the uploader or for them, with permission from copyright owners if necessary.
+ Derivative Works: Posting submissions with portions of other artists' work is allowed with permission.
+ Human Characters: Human characters are permitted, but not in sexual situations.
+ Photography: Photography is allowed if it's of artwork or a background part of an artwork.
+ AI: Use of open-source AI tools is permitted with appropriate keywords and limits.
+ Video: Video is permitted, following all rules outlined.
+ Harassment: No images intended to harass anyone.
+ Screenshots: No screenshots from games or software unless they show original artwork.
+ User Icons and Thumbnails: Must adhere to rules, including no adult material.
+ Reposting: Same work cannot be posted more than once within 72 hours or three times in total.
+ Removal: Inkbunny reserves the right to remove content that may be harmful to the site or users.
Now, let's cross-reference with the archived pages:
**Cross-Reference**
I've identified some discrepancies between the two pages:
1. **Human Characters**: The original text states that human characters are permitted in artwork, but not in sexual situations. However, the archived page from 2024 states that human characters are permitted in artwork, but "no explicit or suggestive content" is allowed.
2. **Photography**: The original text states that photography is allowed if it's of artwork or a background part of an artwork. However, the archived page states that photography is allowed, but "general photography" is not permitted.
3. **AI**: The original text states that use of open-source AI tools is permitted with appropriate keywords and limits. However, the archived page does not mention AI specifically.
4. **Reposting**: The original text states that the same work cannot be posted more than once within 72 hours or three times in total. The archived page states that the same work cannot be posted more than once within 72 hours, but does not mention a total limit of three times.
Please note that these discrepancies may be due to changes in the policy over time or differences in formatting between the two pages.
Would you like me to elaborate on any of these points or help with further analysis?
--used Leo chatbot
Cheers!
| Viewed: |
4 times |
| Added: |
1 month, 2 weeks ago
28 Feb 2025 23:55 CET
|
|
|
