Okay hear me out on this.
FA updated its policies, as we all expected, and babyfurs, even non-sexual ones, are effectively banned. They've written the rules in such a way that bans everything with even a wet diaper.
I tell people to go here, and they get mad at me, because of "cub porn". Leave aside reality vs fantasy, etc, the fact is the optics here are bad. My personal opinion on cub art (that if youre not hurting a real human person, then its fine) are of no consequence to this, i'm talking about general public perceptions.
E621, as I've pointed out in the past, allows much of what Inkbunny does, and nobody really has a problem with it. Because they block out the cub porn with a pre-populated blacklist that only can be modified with an account. So when you go to e621 without an account, you dont see the cub art and other of the "problematic" fetish material. And when you DO get an account on e621 (see i bet you didn't even KNOW you could get an account there - i used it for years without one) you can edit the blacklist and see all the cub art and whatever else. A lot of my diaper stuff only became visible when I logged into e621 and adjusted my tag filter list.
In other words, if a new Inkbunny account has a PRE POPULATED tag filter that gets rid of most of the cub porn, it would go a long way towards the perceptions of the site. Now its possible that wouldn't matter, and the antis wouldn't come here anyways based on the years of reputation of a cp free for all that inkbunny has, and that may be true, it might be a better experience for a general user that could, in time, understand how block lists work and edit it to their own preferences, instead of having them have to do it up front while seeing a bunch of stuff they might not like.
Just.. something to think about
| Viewed: |
312 times |
| Added: |
9 months, 2 weeks ago
22 Oct 2024 21:35 CEST
|
|
|
