Welcome to Inkbunny...
Allowed ratings
To view member-only content, create an account. ( Hide )
GunpowderGreenTea

Discussion: Bombgirls VS Girls with Bombs

This year for April Fool's, I'm doing things I haven't done before or in a great while. While I continue on what that means art-wise, let's have a discussion about the two kinds of sexy explosive potentials you'd find with a fetish like mine. To make things clear, there is no wrong answer to this discussion. This is a matter of preferences and I'm biased in this regard. I'd like to explain what I like and you can tell me what you like. Perhaps we can both find new appreciation for both.

Also, this is assuming my personal taste of cartoon physics with subjects living unharmed and not the logical result of the real world. Do not try anything suggested in this journal or my gallery at home.

First things first, what's the appeal of either? One, I'm a hopeless romantic with over-the-top expectations. A blastwave of heat and force enveloping the body during orgasm is what I'd call "over-the-top". Second is that I find power sexy. Power can come in many forms, but one that's measured in a unit called "megatons" is undeniable.

In the matter of Bombgirls and Girls with Bombs, I admit that I like the latter a lot more. I heard once in an argument about real VS fake boobs that the girl with the fake breasts obviously wants them more. I think that's part of it. I tend to like it when the person in the picture likes it, so anyone being willingly around them and ready for the blast interests me more than a being who just happened to be born into the potential scenario.

Second is adjustability. Bombgirls only have one kind of explosion. Being able to add or subtract to the equation makes it more flexible. Do you want a one dynamite stick "quickie", an all night long pile of ordinance, or something in between? Plus it can help set the tone and setting. Someone wanting private time in a bunker shows bashfulness for their loud fascination, while fireworks on stage show more of an exhibitionism nature.

Now for what I think is the main strength of Bombgirls: the personal aspect of carrying the power every moment of every day. It makes aspects of their lives more interesting seeing how they live, what kind of job they would work, is their explosive nature a blessing or curse, do they like exploding, and more. Then you get into the sexy territory and how they interact with one or more romantic partners. You can throw all sorts of curveballs like what their trigger is, how well can they control it, etc.

I could go on, but I'd like to keep it brief enough that I don't chicken out of posting this. Please tell me what you think about either of these, what you like, why, and maybe there's a third side to this I never considered. Hope you all have a good one!
Viewed: 7 times
Added: 3 years, 1 month ago
 
Norithics
3 years, 1 month ago
It feels like I've wandered into a conversation that's very inside-baseball, but I want to know more. I know what a girl with a bomb is, but what is a bomb girl? Like... Whitty from Friday Night Funkin, but as a girl?
GunpowderGreenTea
3 years, 1 month ago
A bomb girl is pretty much what it says on the tin. A girl with the ability to explode. Whitty would be a more literal example where they have an actual bomb as part of their anatomy. Some can look fully human/animal (or anywhere in between) with some sort of fuse, timer, color changing, or other to show their explosive potential.

Bomb girls can also have certain quirks when they're lit. One that hooked me into the idea that I forgot to list above is that they can have their breasts grow while the fuse burns or timer ticks down.

Also, I thought your Cherry Bomb character was a bomb girl.
New Comment:
Move reply box to top
Log in or create an account to comment.