Too many guys online love to trash talk about furries committing bestiality. They lace their shutting down of furries with righteous indignation about animal abusers being protected. These same guys will then brag and about wanting to hunt furries just like real animals. The cognitive dissonance in this should be readily striking to anyone who's not delusional. And this of course is beside their usual ranting against weak beta faggots and weak genetics. So this forum post by a guy is actually very revealing about these typical guys' motivations. Guys do not oppose bestiality because they care about animals. They oppose it just to get to the guy doing it, who is the "faggot".
In fact the behavioral track record of guys online is they want to trash environmentalism, animal rights and vegetarianism—causes they consider annoying, weird and for faggots—brag about eating loads of meat and using animal and polluting products, joke about casual animal cruelty... It's obvious these typical guys do not betray compassion for animals. Also, you only need to look at the recent coverage disparity between the Notre Dame cathedral fire versus the currently atmosphere-devouring Amazon rainforest fires, to see compassion for animals does not run in our default programming.
I would like to find more of these blatant postings if they're out there. This needs to be a very important point pushed back on these attackers that use bestiality-hunting as a narrative. Rob them of their righteousness, and put them of the spot. They are not genuine, and just mean to do harm to other guys.