The difference between a picture of a midget, a short character and a loli seems to be presentation, perception and perspective. Just something I've absorbed in my years of internet wanderings and musings. These three factors are applied between an artist, a viewer and the admin of a given community. The latter being just a viewer with more rights to make a judgement on their critique.
I've witnessed so many battles over the years involving things like big breasted goblins, gnomes and yordles over whether they are short critters or loli ones. I can understand the contention, to a point. Pai-loli is a thing. Fricken nuts how the lengths some people go to to not ever look upon what they deem to be loli though. Even a size difference involving a character SHOWN to be five feet tall IN THE IMAGE and one of seven feet interacting can set off this almost phobic reaction. Mere angle of view, actual perspective, can effect this as well. It is hilarious to see someone spurg out over a J-cup character shown from a high angle. I mean, I try not to assume anything too weird when a character's breasts are hiding everything below in an image. I just think, "BIG BOOBS!"
The things that actually decides it for me is an actual ratio that can be used for head to body comparison, body type and the words of the artist. If the artist says loli, even with a very mature body type, I'll shrug and go, "Okay... Loli..." If the head to body ratio falls into a certain realm, I think, "Probably loli." If the body type is mature and the artist says gnome, I'll think, "Short adult of non-human variety. Different rules apply."
Just giving voice to some long thoughts. Giggety...
| Viewed: |
9 times |
| Added: |
5 years, 9 months ago
10 Jul 2018 22:25 CEST
|
|
|
