Welcome to Inkbunny...
Allowed ratings
To view member-only content, create an account. ( Hide )
coyotek

*sigh*

https://www.furaffinity.net/view/904286/
Got removed from gallery due to site terms violation . Would make a joke about how depicted underage pornography is ok with the site terms, but thats normal here ._.
Viewed: 816 times
Added: 6 years, 8 months ago
 
cooncub
6 years, 8 months ago
But I don't see any sex acts here, just a peep show. Oh well, guess its hard to run a site and worry about the stuff posted, I myself wouldn't want the job but I still love IB as it's my home.
phyrexfirestorm
6 years, 8 months ago
ok, was removed from HERE?
You know, you can find all kinda of humans on this site, some of which are in WAY worse scenarios, and yet they still stay up. Then you get pictures like yours, or for that matter, a story which doesnt even MENTION humans in it, and they get taken down.

What.
The.
Effin.
Hell.


Fuckin hypocrites.

Still, I enjoy IB because it's a good way to host my works.
LupineAssassin
6 years, 8 months ago
Hope you plan to stay on IB longer. We love your art! ^^
Nopast
6 years, 8 months ago
uhm, why? O=
Saglinger
6 years, 8 months ago
I've said it a few times.  IB's staff is slowly degrading and getting more and more overzealous with their removal of pictures involving humans, or human-looking non-humans(one artist had anthro ponies, and was forced to remove all of his nudes, for example)
Mewtwolover
5 years, 7 months ago
Who's that artist, can those pics be seen on somewhere else?
Saglinger
5 years, 7 months ago
AnoNJG .
EroKord
6 years, 8 months ago
If it's an anime style kemono then it's just not welcome. Not even like kemonomimi. Full on furry, done Japanese style. not allowed.

I was ok with the explanation for human porn and catgirls etc. but this is just getting full on retarded, even by the strictest look at the rules, that image should have been fine. No human has any genitals showing.

edit: basically if it doesn't have many animal facial features, you're fucked. you can't have a furry with a humanoid nose it seems...
CFWaffles
6 years, 8 months ago
So is my Hetalia/Family guy joke picture soon to end up on the chopping block? it's only suggestive on anal sex and what sound england makes.

Also had a peice of art locked recently (wasn't animal furry, but had body hair but had no nose)

I blame the etc they put in the rules leaving them way way too openended.
EroKord
6 years, 8 months ago
Perhaps? I think someone I was watching earlier had an image removed because a fully clothed human was spanking a furry, and the furry had an orgasm, or at least peed herself.

Dunno if that's more sexual, or less sexual, or if the offending item was self removed because they thought it might break the rules.

This is a great site with a great community, but if you want artistic freedom, it seems SoFurry is the better option. From what I see they allow things FA and IB don't.
CFWaffles
6 years, 8 months ago
that sucks, hopefully keeping mine litterally above the belt keeps that submission safe
SetsuneW
6 years, 8 months ago
From what I've seen they've been pretty consistent with the "no humans" rule for a while now, it's kind of unfortunate they can't just host anything, but I think it's the line in the sand they had to draw to support something the site set out to support, the fantasy cub content, which every other archive was cutting out due to legal fears.
Parallax
6 years, 6 months ago
I'd have to say that I don't think this should have been taken down. The background's got a person in it, but that's just a still frame from a movie serving as a background layer. The main image in the foreground is definitely a furry character.
Lestria
6 years, 2 months ago
It's like ping-pong, go to one site for movie parodys and vanilla sex the other for pretty-much everything else. One site's afraid of big business law the other vice.  Each one proving to the other that they really  are 'just cartoons'...........
starling
6 years ago
Crazy old late reply here but.. our message to you made it clear that the issue was the fact it used a derivative screenshot or other copyright content that you didn't create (screenshot from a movie). It had noting to do with the presence of a human. Bit late saying that here I guess for all the people that now think otherwise. ;.; But if anyone else sees this comment I hope it'll clear up any misunderstanding.
JackDesert
5 years, 8 months ago
glad I didn't post my SL mods here then... would have kept you guys busy taking them down because I liked using RL scenery pictures as a back drop like a Tibetian temple or bamboo forests.  Most of them came from old movie stills I had.
SpaceCat
5 years, 5 months ago
ahhh I see
SpaceCat
5 years, 5 months ago
maybe you shouldn't be so quick to jump to conclusions
coyotek
5 years, 5 months ago
I didnt jump to a conclusion. I wrote "Got removed from gallery due to site terms violation", the human part is what people added themselves.
SpaceCat
5 years, 5 months ago
My bad. I guess the part about mentioning the "underage" art site rules is what confused me. That and people jumping on it and you not correcting them. Not that I expect you to correct every drama person, because that would take a long time I think.  
New Comment:
Move reply box to top
Log in or create an account to comment.