Welcome to Inkbunny...
Allowed ratings
To view member-only content, create an account. ( Hide )
Trash Factory
« older newer »
AerynSkirrow
AerynSkirrow's Gallery (12)

Crab Nicholson Extreme Sleepover

megawolf77 - 410N3
set default image size: small | medium | wide
First in pool
megawolf77 - 410N3
The coloration of this was inspired by a certain submission by Renard V on FA.

... Eh, didn't think of it before, but I guess this is already straining the rules of the site...  I mean, it IS a crab with human-like features, yes?  You can hardly claim it's a human with superficial animal features.

But I honestly have no idea who originally drew the line art used to make the original box image (which originated from 4Chan /v/).  Considering that the original artist (supposedly) commented positively upon its use for the B&W box image and encouraged the ensuing meme, I'm getting the impression that the creator doesn't mind its usage and distribution.

[Know Your Meme: Crab Nicholson]

Keywords
male 1,108,921, solo 95,313, game 11,764, sunglasses 2,545, crab 651, nintendo ds 108, box art 13, blue crab 2, jack nicholson 2, crab nicholson 1
Details
Type: Picture/Pinup
Published: 13 years, 9 months ago
Rating: General

MD5 Hash for Page 1... Show Find Identical Posts [?]
Stats
59 views
2 favorites
4 comments

BBCode Tags Show [?]
 
GreenReaper
13 years, 9 months ago
Yeah, I saw this one in the queue and I don't know either. It's a crab with a human head. o_O
AerynSkirrow
13 years, 9 months ago
Eh, the way I see it that puts it on the opposite side of "human with superficial animal features"...  But I don't know if that puts it readily within the scope of the site, or clearly out...

I mean, I haven't browsed around the site much yet, but 'feral' art is apparently considered appropriate content, although I don't know if 'ordinary animal' art is.  If 'feral' art is allowed as the characters are still mentally anthropomorphic, well...  That's not exactly going to be something shown in every picture, which makes it a sort of context-qualifier...
GreenReaper
13 years, 9 months ago
I think one issue is that a specific human is being pariodied. But also that he has a clearly human head.
AerynSkirrow
13 years, 9 months ago
The thing is, then it comes down to determining which human features are usable without making something 'not furry' and which aren't, which is kind of inconvenient...  Because I've never actually seen any furry art site give a set of detailed guidelines for that.

As far as I've seen, I suppose you'd be right in that the head is basically the only 'not furry' human part, but even that is kind of iffy if it still has fur on it, which wouldn't make any sense given the 'superficial animal characteristics' thing.  *Shrug*
New Comment:
Move reply box to top
Log in or create an account to comment.