Inkbunny

Rich ;___;

Zippo

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

Correction: "Rich Bitch"
Naw, am not rich, just incredibly lucky a rich friend asked what I needed to return a favor.
It has a liquid cooling dangerden copper water block on it too.
Had a 660ti till a month ago.
Id go with the gtx 1080ti tho if ya wait a bit if ya got the cash.
Dont even think about that AMD junk~

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I can't even afford the 3GB 1060. lol

Even if I could save up enough for months and months, I wouldn't be able to justify to spending $700 on a piece for my computer.

At this point I'm probably just gonna sell my body or drugs.

Those are my only options. lol

Zippo

7 years, 1 month ago

link

That was going to be may card of choice, but the 6gb version instead until better things happened.
You know you got to sell your body, even if ya have to blow your load at the cum doner shack.
Pimp dat ass for the cuda cores man. :3

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I'll just have to be patient and save up. I might be able to save up by the end of the year if I steadily take more commissions and don't buy anything else.

But I just bought Mass Effect Andromeda Deluxe Edition. So that's my big spend for the year. lol

caramelthecalf

7 years, 1 month ago

link

hehehe =3 *daydreams of having one*

QueenSaryala

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I personally got myself a EVGA GTX970. which is serving me pretty well so far. in addition, I got EVGA's boost program that's available on steam and run it at full speed when I game. so it'll serve me for a good long time till I have enough to find when the EVGA version of the GTX 1080 goes on sale.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ QueenSaryala

The 970 is still very good. It should last you quite a while, yet. As long as you stay at 1080p.

QueenSaryala

7 years, 1 month ago

link

since I only have a 1080p monitor, that's perfectly fine. though I have seen how super sampling to 2K helps with the visuals. but for the most part, it's not noticeable enough to use. Which I think is kind of why the PS4 pro is kind of running itself into the ground by forcing having to use super sampling as it's means to "improve visuals" rather than just running high resolution textures and graphical effects. most people can't actually see the difference super sampling gives.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ QueenSaryala

High res monitors were just way to sell more crap you don't need because people found that 1080p was the sweet spot for gaming.

Any bigger monitor than 24 inches is useless for a monitor monitor because you're constantly looking around it.

And 4k requires so much money it's not feasible right now, and only a few games really benefit from that resolution.

QueenSaryala

7 years, 1 month ago

link

yeah. the only ones that really do are the simulator games. Cause I saw a whole gaming rig specifically for a racing simulator system that uses 3 GTX1080s to run 3 4K TVs that are set up infront of a racing chair with a steering wheel and pedal system. So in that case, it works. But in a vast majority of settings, 1080p is just right. or in PC terms, 1920x1080. Cause apperently that's not exactly the same thing as 1080p. But it's the PC equivalent.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ QueenSaryala

The new cards don't support 3 way SLI, though. Not without some serious modding.

I'm currently gaming at 1920x1200 (16:10 Master Race)

Mylen

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Dude I still have a 660ti and a 750ti LOL

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ Mylen

I know that feel. I had a 650 ti for years, and years.

WideWindyWaters

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ Mylen

I upgraded into the 1k series from a 660ti, hah.

esanhusky

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ Mylen

Ditto on the 750ti :D

hdmi

7 years, 1 month ago

link

RX480 is better in dx12 games and in the future if you ever want a nice monitor with adaptive sync, freesync is about 250$ cheaper than gsync usually because manufacturers don't have to pay licensing fees. It's your choice, but i'd recommend it. I'm using 2 msi 970s but if I had to buy a new gpu at the moment it'd be an rx480

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ hdmi

I'll be long dead in my grave before an anything AMD comes near my tower.

QueenSaryala

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I am running an AMD motherboard and CPU, But other wise, Nvidia makes the far better graphics cards. the radion series have had a few issues when it comes to some optomizations with games.

Seclius

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I feel yah, I'm in desperate need of an upgrade myself (still sporting a Radeon 7870 hd). Once AMD's mid-tier Ryzen cpus hit the market, I'm gutting and upgrading my whole rig.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ Seclius

Yeah, they're pretty tits from what was shown.

But we'll wait and see when the actual benchmarks come out.

AMD has a terrible habit of cherry picking performance numbers to make themselves look better.

Seclius

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I'm definitely going to check benchmarks before I buy. My whole idea is this. Either 1. Intel will lower prices to compete more at which point I'm probably going Intel (like a i5 7500) or 2. Intel doesn't change and AMD stays in a better price to performance ratio, at which point I'm going with a Ryzen 5 series cpu. I'll just have to wait to see.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ Seclius

My nine year old i7-975 is still viable for gaming, and even out performs the FX-8350 line.

AMD's new Ryzen 7 line is just a bit more powerful as Haswell / Broadwell.

Skylake and Kabylake were designed to fix the bugs that Haswell and Broadwell had, so they're only just a little bit more powerful than the previous generation because they have a higher base multiplier.

Intel does this all the time, it's very annoying. They were intentionally waiting on AMD to release their Zen architecture so they could gage it and make adjustments accordingly.

We probably won't see their 10nm cannonlake architecture until the end of 2018 / middle of 2019.

But this is actually a good thing. Now that AMD has gotten their shit together it might drive competition and bring down the prices for everyone.

Seclius

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I'm REALLY crossing my fingers for Ryzen because in terms of a gpu, I can personally afford to skim. I play really cpu-intensive games like Cities Skylines and Total War, and my current cpu (I'm embarrassed to say this, an fx-6300) just cannot keep up with these single core heavy games. I think Cities evens out the workload on all available cores so that game's fine, but Total War Attila is abysmal on my system because it only works through one core. My gpu lets me put on the highest settings so the game looks beautiful but I have to place the unit scale down otherwise my cpu has a heart attack trying to calculate all of the soldiers actions lol.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

@ Seclius

You can get an eight core Intel Xeon CPU for $75. lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ak8GsI0bbjA

SnakeOttsel

7 years, 1 month ago

link

You would be better off with RX 480 over GTX 1060

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ SnakeOttsel

Get out.

SnakeOttsel

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Show me where AMD touched you on this puppet, please.

Seclius

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ SnakeOttsel

That was actually a pretty funny response +1

spaceman1088

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ SnakeOttsel

Ahahahahah....Oh I laughed waaaay harder at that that I probably should have. I have no idea as to why he would denounce AMD if they were actually better, which my RX 460 4GB is compared to Nvidia of the same price range.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ spaceman1088

Actually, even the 3GB 1060 pulls ahead of the 4GB 480.

AMD has a habit of rebranding their new and calling it something new.

With the exception of Ryzen (which required the intervention of an ex-Intel employee) they haven't released anything noteworthy in over a decade.

nousername353

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ spaceman1088

AMD cards are fine for web browsing and word processing. If you want gaming, you are better off with Nvidia.

AlienMarksman

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I have my GTX980ti 6GB, and it does more than enough for my needs ATM.
Mostly because I only have a Single 24" 1080 monitor.

I have a 3440 x 1440 32" Curved monitor on my "Soon to buy" list, along with a MSI GTX1080 'Seahawk' water cooled card.
But they'll both have to wait till around August.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ AlienMarksman

Your 980 ti should serve you incredibly well, even for a few more years to come.

The 1060 is about 2 - 5% more powerful than the 980, so the ti variant is roughly 20 - 25% more powerful than that.

Right now the 980 ti is just behind the 1070 by such a small amount it wouldn't even be noticeable.

If you're going for an upgrade, I'd save up and pick the 1080 ti that launches in two weeks for $699. It's 35% more powerful than the 1080, and by the time you decide to upgrade in some months, should come down in price to around $599 or even lower.

AlienMarksman

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Yeah, I'm not looking for the massive gains in performance.
Hopefully there'll be a water cooled version of the 1080ti available. It's the Heat management and Quietness I'm after.
The joys of living in the tropics.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ AlienMarksman

I'm sure there will be.

If you get a 1080 ti you won't have to buy another graphics card for like eight to ten years. lol

(Unless you move to 4k, then you might need another one in about five years for SLI.)

whitepawrolls

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Would rather have a new motherboard and more ram myself. the ones that came with my new computer SUCK :p

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ whitepawrolls

Thankfully motherboards and ram are dirt chip.

Biostar makes a $45 motherboard that's killer. And you can get RAM from China for like $20.

crissyfox

7 years, 1 month ago

link

if all you are going for is 1080p 60fps gaming you can get by with a gtx 1050 ti or a radeon 480. the 1050 is about 160 and the radeon is about 200, usd.

crissyfox

7 years, 1 month ago

link

"	crissyfox wrote:
	if all you are going for is 1080p 60fps gaming you can get by with a gtx 1050 ti or a radeon 480. the 1050 is about 160 and the radeon is about 200, usd.

yea ignore that part i didnt read your journal carefully enough :P

either of those video cards should be able to easily support 1200p.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

Sadly the 1050 ti is 2 - 5% less powerful than the GTX 960. lol

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-960-vs...

crissyfox

7 years, 1 month ago

link

hmmmm ... well anyway the radeon 480 is still stronger, i believe :P

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

You believe incorrectly, sir. .-.

They're closely matched, but the 6GB 1060 pulls ahead by about 10% in eight out of ten tests.

crissyfox

7 years, 1 month ago

link

hmmm well i dunno then i didnt do any research on the 1050 or 1060, or any amd video cards, because i am going with 1080's in my pc, might go for 1080 ti though if its better.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

The 1080 ti is 35% faster than the 1080. But also costs a bit more.

But I believe certain companies offer a step-up program if you already have the 1080, you can pay the difference and send in your 1080, and they will give you the ti variant.

crissyfox

7 years, 1 month ago

link

ahhhh, cool cool, like i said i really dont look up the computer stuff much, but i watch a bunch of different hardware testing channels. which is why i am probably gonna get an amd ryzen, since i wanna do video work, and rendering in blender eventually, and the ryzen seems to be a bit better at those tasks. i'll decide on a video card thats good for playing games, and rendering/encoding.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Eh.... A lot of the popular tech channels have been sucking AMD's cock lately...

You should watch the Ryzen Video that Gamers Nexus did.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7UBHjtCXhU

But, Ryzen 7 Chips would be better for 1. Eight Cores with sixteen threads. 2. Lower price than a current eight core Intel Chip.

Unless you consider older sockets. Then you can get an eight core Intel Xeon CPU for $75. lol

crissyfox

7 years, 1 month ago

link

yes i have seen that video as well as a bunch of other tech channels who have been critical of ryzen, since i plan on media creation as well as gaming the ryzen 1800x seems to be a really good median. If i was going pure gaming i would do Intel's 7700k, and if i was willing to drop 1k for a content producing machine cpu i would get an Intel 6900k.

Ryzen 1800x is good enough for gaming or me and its pretty good for rendering and encoding, comparing to the 6900k. i actualyl wanna do some 3d rendering on my next computer so i am probably gonna get some nice beefy video cards, likely the 1080 ti's.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

You can still game on the Core 2 Quad CPU's from a thousand years old.

CPU's for gaming is a ridiculous choice. But since you're factoring in media creation Ryzen would be the cheapest option for you in terms of raw computing power.

[coughing intensifies]

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Xeon-E5-2670-2-6GHz-20MB...

crissyfox

7 years, 1 month ago

link

*giggles* yea i know about xeon processors, and how cost effective they are. but by the time i am ready to build my computer ryzen should be fully implemented in windows and programs. right now windows 10 has an issue with ryzens SMT that is causing some weird issues with its multi threading. and as other programs are updated to utilize ryzens SMT its performance should go up.

it probably wont come to the pure raw performance from intels 7700k and 6900k, but it'll be a good enough compromise for gaming and content creation.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Unfortunately there's no driver optimization that can fix a CPU. lol

However, it's your money, my friend. Whatever you decide I wish you luck.

I'm just one of those people who's really poor so I have to scrounge at the left over pickings from the elitists that upgrade every eighteen months. X3

crissyfox

7 years, 1 month ago

link

well i wasn't talking about driver optimization. most games dont use more than 4 cores since gamers tend to use quad core cpu's. but creation programs use as many cores as available. also intel hyperthreading and amd's SMT are different applications of a similar principal, but unfortunately windows doesnt know how to use SMT, as well as many other programs, so devs will have to update their programs to support SMT.

Ryzen isnt the best at anything, but its great at everything. and thats what i like about it, it has the power to drive 144HZ monitors during gaming sessions, and can still stream or make videos nicely.

if i was only gonna do gaming i would get a 7700k. but i wanna do content creation, like making videos and eventually 3d rendering.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

You don't have to convince me, brother.

I see a lot of people who use that line "games can't use more than four cores."

That's not really how CPU's handle tasks in games, and it's not actually accurate to how video games work.

Some games are "optimized" for multiple cores, like GTA V. It can use as many as sixteen threads. But that doesn't mean anymore than four will offer more of a benefit.

My advice to you would be to buy what you want and hang the rest.

The differences between Ryzen and Haswell and Broadwell based Intel CPU's would be a matter of seconds and milliseconds in frame times and would be nearly inconceivable to you as a human.

crissyfox

7 years, 1 month ago

link

yea which is why i am not concerned with gaming performance on the ryzen, i mean its still pulling in over a hundred FPS in games, 200 in vulkan games. i am getting it because it is faster at doing workload tasks, like i said i wanna get into 3d rendering and video making, and ryzen is faster in those areas than the 7700k and 6900k, at least from what i am seeing.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Eh lol

WideWindyWaters

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

I was debating the same thing earlier in the year but decided the money was better spent towards a 1070, it'll be more relevant for much longer. The 1060 is only barely better than your card.

Your artwork is pretty awesome though. I haven't commissioned anyone in a long time, but normally I just assume you're swamped with commissions like most other art-4-hire folks here.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ WideWindyWaters

Bro. Do you even benchmark? The 1060 is 80% more powerful than the 960.

And it's on par with the 980, and overclocked to 2Ghz can reach numbers of the 980 ti at 1080p.

The 1060 will be relevant at 1080p for years to come. The 1070 was designed for 1440p, so it's that much more powerful. (Roughly about 35 - 40%.)

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1060-6...

But yeah, I haven't taken any commissions in a long time. I still have a few from friends that I've not finished from 2016.

My life's been kind of hard right now, and video games are kind of like my antidepressant.

Weiss

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I have a GTX 750 TI and i'm fine with it. Mostly because i don't really care about running games at max settings and according to what i've been able to see my rig can handle ME Andromeda. Not at max settings but, again, i'm fine with that

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ Weiss

Well. The 750 ti was amazing for it's time. But it's quickly showing it's age now.

I'd put your settings for Mass Effect around 35 - 40 fps at low at 768p.

http://www.game-debate.com/games/index.php?g_id=5581&a...

I have a pretty good rep at Game Debate, and I'm always helping people with their systems. ;D

Weiss

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I use that site myself, i have an account there and use it to check the settings. And like i said i don't mind playing at lower settings to get more FPS and i don't need TOO high of an FPS count. honestly 40 FPS would be fine for me. And besides, the requirements that the devs put out are often grossly exagerated

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ Weiss

Oh, I know. You don't have to tell me that.

I think that, if you can handle Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda won't be too much more difficult.

I made a big rant about it on the reddit some weeks back.

But, I grew up in the 80's and 90's. And I've done the low settings at 640x480 at 19 fps.

I want some fucking graphical fidelity now. X3

Weiss

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Oh yeah it can easily handle Inquisition, even with mods and stuff. I think it can even handle it on high settings but i forget

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ Weiss

Andromeda should be about 20 - 30% more demanding than Inquisition. So you're probably in the clear.

The 750 ti was a great little card in it's time.

Lef

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Lucky. My last discrete videocard was radeon x1950pro. From 2006. It hands on the wall now xD

And currently I use a laptop with Core i3 2370m and integrated video... I wonder if gta4 will works on it? through Wine. >__>

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

You poor thing. ;___;

I built my gaming desktop for $380. And it can handle literally any game I throw at it on high settings at 1200p. lol

Lef

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I recently dropped all I had to a Cintiq, but I'm not sure I'll get it the next month, oh well...

Anyway maybe someday I build a basic gaming pc. Moreover recently was announced a new *cheap* processors, you know) https://pp.userapi.com/c638419/v638419388/1eb53/W5l1LZv...

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

That picture won't open for me. lol

Lef

7 years, 1 month ago

link

http://imgur.com/a/j2sdq and now? ^^,

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Ryzen is shit. lol

The Game Nexus benchmark that's out clearly shows that AMD hyped the shit out of Ryzen to make it look better. But it's not the Intel killer that people try to make out to be.

Also that's a ridiculous price for a full desktop set up.

I build my entire gaming PC for $380.

And I have a quad core i7 with 12 GBs of RAM and a GTX 960.

Lef

7 years, 1 month ago

link

That pic was just an example of a whole computer for the price of Intel processor xD
I've already seen some real Ryzen tests and it runs pretty well.
Also in some countries prices for computer parts and other hi-tech devices ridiculously inflated >__>

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7UBHjtCXhU

AMD Cherry picks their numbers to make their shit look better. As amazing as Ryzen is compared to their old lineup, it still has a ton of problems and is only up to about Haswell / Broadwell levels. Which is amazing considering the newest i3s where destroying the Bulldozer line just a few months ago.

But, I do understand. You should also know that the intel CPU you showed me is the top of the line workstation CPU designed for media productivity and not everyday commercial use. (Similar to the Ryzen 7 CPUs that just came out, as you can see in the video their benchmarks are only just average for gaming.)

My CPU is an Xeon W3580 (i7-975), a first gen CPU that's almost nine years old, which only cost me $35, and can still perform amazingly well today. CPU's are so powerful, that even almost a decade later they are still more than powerful enough to handle not only gaming, but video encoding, too. Sure, the 6950x can encode a 1080p video in thirty seconds, and mine takes about two minutes, but it's not a big issue for me.

It's the GRAPHICS that's improving so much so quickly. (Hence why I wanted the 1060 upgrade. ;D)

So a good $200 or even $150 CPU can last you for years and years as long as you have the scalability to improve your graphics in the long run.

Singemylover

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I feel for you, but playing games on console is a lot less stressful and a lot cheaper! Especially for a broke-ass, like myself! Lol Besides, I don't have room for a desktop, anyways.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ Singemylover

That is true to some extent. Consoles are better for some people. And I actually used to game very heavily on my original Xbox back when it came out.

But I use my PC for basically everything.

Drawing, watching tv, youtube, video editing, surfing, email, text and chatting with various social media accounts, playing games, listening to music, burning DVDs for my friends of the newest movies.

Not to mention the dozens of MMOs you can play on PC but aren't available on a console.

I'll probably never go back to consoles.

anewIB

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I have a 6gb GTX 1060 in my laptop (only have a 2gb GTX 770 in my desktop) and the difference is definitely noticeable - hope you get yours soon!

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

@ anewIB

Gotta sell some cubs! ;D

But hopefully I'll have one by my birthday.

CXM420

7 years, 1 month ago

link

*looks at my specs*

So far my 1050Ti works fine...

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ CXM420

Yeah, the 1050 ti is great.

But the 1050 and 1050 ti are just pascal branded 950/960. The performance is nearly identical between them.

nousername353

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Check Amazon when you decide to buy. I got my 1060 6GB for $280 a few months ago. Huge performance bump over my 960 4GB I bought last year for about the same price.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ nousername353

I was checking newegg mostly. Zotac has a 1060 6GB for a good price.

But eBay has some really amazing deals, too.

nousername353

7 years, 1 month ago

link

If you are planning on overclocking the card, I would recommend staying away from the mini cards.  The cooling capability is not nearly as good as the full size ones.  I use an MSI and the stock cooling is handling all my overclocking with no strain at all.

I used to buy from NewEgg a lot, built multiple systems from them, but their return policy is a mess.  If you need to return anything, it's a nightmare.  For example, I had bought a Corsair modular power supply.  It was missing a couple cables, so I requested a replacement.  Two days later I got approval to send it back.  Over a week later they sent another... the same one... still missing cables.  I sent it back again, they sent another that didn't even power up... but it had all the cables.  I requested a refund and they told me I would be charged a restocking fee.  I ended up throwing it away.

Had a bad CPU from Amazon, contacted them, within a few hours they responded.  I sent it back and within three days I had a new one at my door.  Also, bought a hard drive once, internal, but found an external on sale elsewhere for half the price so I bought that and pulled the drive out of it (BTW, great way to save a ton on HDD).  Contacted Amazon, asked if I could return the drive.  No problem, no fee, refunded as soon as they got it.  Also, NewEgg shipping can take a week sometimes (their "3 day shipping" doesn't count the 3-4 days it takes them to get around to even shipping it, only delivery time, Amazon shipping is two days.

eBay has been hit or miss for me.  Sometimes I have received amazing deals (like a stack of ASRock Fatality motherboards for $80, all perfectly working) but other times I have been ripped off (people selling cpu boxes containing the heatsink but no CPU).  Thankfully, they tend to be pretty good about getting problems fixed.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

@ nousername353

All of the used parts in my system came from eBay aside from my 960, which I bought new on Newegg.

Overall, I built my gaming PC for literally less than $380.

I'm not overly concerned with it, I can usually tell apart the deals from the rip-offs.

I wasn't really planning to overclock the card, the 1060 boosts to 2 GHz on it's own.

And my 960 SC has a single fan and is considered a mini, and it's factory overclocked to 1439 Mhz and I've only seen it go above 65C playing Battlefield 1 multiplayer during a huge behemoth fight with warplanes everywhere.

Acenith

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Mass Effect Andromeda.... I ordered it for the xbox due to only having a GTX 760TI lol

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Actually the 760 ti would have been able to handle it at medium/high at 1080p.

But, it would probably be a similar experience on Xbox with the settings down, anyways.

I would just hate to use a controller, blegh.

Acenith

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I'll be using my Xbox one elite controller either way lmao. But the collectors did not allow a option for the deluxe edition for the PC. Only PS4 or Xbox.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Damn, you bought the collectors edition? I have the Deluxe, and that was breaking my budget. lol

If I was rich, I would have gotten the one with the RC Nomad. X3

Acenith

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

Incomtax... And I did get the RC >.>

Thus went ALL my spending monies

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Bro. You gotta let me come over and drive it. X3

Acenith

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I don't believe that you live remotely near the peninsula of WA. :p

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I live close to the OTHER Washington.

But I hear wonderful things about the Pacific Northwest.

Acenith

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Was pissing on us today. Was raining big time.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

I don't mind the rain. I used to live in Southern California (not that it rained) but we would visit up-state California to go camping and fishing. I always wanted to go a bit higher into Oregon and Washington to look for Bigfoot.

blackstrike

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Heh, me and you like same things :) I already bought 1060 (6 Gb version) and AMD 8350 (didn't want to cash out for Ryzen until it gets more support), so I can FINALLY play games as they should be played.

MakoRuu

7 years, 1 month ago

link

Edited 7 years, 1 month ago by Owner

@ blackstrike

Ryzen is shit, anyways. AMD lied their asses off again.

If I had known you were buying I would have offered to help you build an amazing system.

My quad core i7 was only $35, and it out performs the 8350. lol

My whole system was only $380.

blackstrike

7 years, 1 month ago

link