_edit2: As life has it I am kinda growing out of the "I still have to hit a few walls hard" notion tho it develops much more organic than I expected. The TTO of IBM made this interesting point à la look what your thing is (like Keirsey and all that, he piggy backed "all that" and made something new that in my eyes went in the right direction) and then make a point to like de-upsess about it (because so far your life was upsessing about it, hamster wheel etc. (obviously he fared a mite more eloquent =p) And ain`t that the artist`s basic notion? yank the up-fuck to eleven so you finnish your thing so, whichever applies, it can let you go or you it xD I think these numbers do a good job helping driving that approach home. _edit: hmmm I will NOT say peculiar. Fascinating notion tho. Just beeing in character here ha
From here: bdsmtest.org
Did it again after what feels like three years (?) and I don`t know wether I just now can make heads n toes of it or whether they added it (assuming the latter tho) in any case there are lots of _neat_ details in the visualizations!
Mostly far over average (_edit3: in these things? d type? s type? wat? it feels awkward.) while not exactly feeling that way, tho I am starting to cross link experiences and hum! That bias which seems to stem from my experimentation interest (_edit4: level of Conc?) still warps this a lot, despite how super crisp the questions developed. And I am not talking about me switching headspaces, intent and interests with a frequency. This is not remotely figured out enough (...in science?! darn white guys) And I guess the feral switchy thing keeps them busy enough considering the psychologists have not even the trinity issue down like at all (HEAVY, heavy sigh =p) Oh and I think I can? Just reminded me of the Fooley Cooley (sp?) song and the rhythm clicked! You know the train from Dumbo? Appearantly it has a name: Casey Jr People say it is creepy to say the least. I am tempted to call semantics...
But yea, visuals! I am admittedly a little thrilled to have so much infos, -and- intuitively that close to each other, ha!
I never get the pervert for some reason. hmmm²
note to self:
Since it is all for science (beeing like 95% serious here xD) it is not remotely as bad as ....... as it looks -to me- xD Still the experimentation bias makes it edgy at best (in the literal sense). Communication is SOO important to me and people just just barely start flexing their awareness. (sentience awareness consciousness, moderation ,..) tldr For good measure. First half too crass second too flimmsy.
The girl boy thing catched me by suprise and catches me more n more off guard by the second o.o
( _Edit3 Took the test again because I derped the link and the graphics along with it I think https://bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=4152210 Was a bit more relaxed I believe )