I've always disliked it, but I feel like bringing it up for the sake of discussion. I like everything about this site except for this one thing.
So human content can exist here, but not in a sexual manner. Why does this rule exist? I'd really like to know its purpose. If the site was exclaiming that this is a community focused solely on non-human content, it makes sense not to allow human-only sexual images, but doesn't make sense that it should still allow human content at all - this disparity contradicts the originally assumed directive.
The way I see it, I don't know what's so wrong in allowing human sexual content so long as something inhuman or anthropomorphic is involved. That content still adheres to the messaged themes of the site.
5 years, 10 months ago
25 Aug 2013 04:20 CEST