Welcome to Inkbunny...
Allowed ratings
To view member-only content, create an account. ( Hide )
Tore

Humans over Inkbunny?

by
Recently, I keep thinking about this... and the more I'm thinking about, the more it's making no sense to me. I totally understand that Inkbunny's administrators want the website to be reserved for furry art: so far, everything is nice and laudable. But then, imagine a piece of art, as a drawing, with two characters in it. One of the characters is furry, while the other one is human. The drawing would still contain furry art, so it would be normal if the piece would have its place over the Inkbunny if you ask me. But isn't the case at the moment.

One may say that some people would hate to see human stuff over the website. Fair enough. But I hate My Little Poney stuff. Am I leaving because there's a lot of stuff related to this over the website? Nope, I simply used the super awesome (really, thanks for that) keyword blocker! Why they wouldn't be able to do so?

So yeah, that's what I had in my mind since sometime. I don't really know if it's only a personal questioning or a call to revolution... but yeah. I let this here and see what happens I guess!
Also, if you're sharing my questioning, don't hesitate to post it too in your own journals.~
Viewed: 34 times
Added: 5 years, 7 months ago
 
JeffyCottonbun
5 years, 7 months ago
You can upload drawn pictures of humans, either solo or with a furry, as long as they're not involved in a sexual situation.
" ACP wrote:

Human characters are permitted in artwork, however they must not appear in sexual situations and must not show genitals or sexual arousal.



Example:
GinSanada and solomon  by zeroSilver
Tore
5 years, 7 months ago
Yes, but why not in sexual situation? That's my wondering. =/
JeffyCottonbun
5 years, 7 months ago
I think it's mostly for safety reasons. But only a mod or the admin could accurately answer this question X3
Tycloud
5 years, 7 months ago
Legal reasons. Since inkbunny allows cub art they do not want a shitstorm if loli and shota cause a legal issue. Think of it as them protecting us and the website.  Besides anthros are way better looking then humans.
Tore
5 years, 7 months ago
Please, don't let your preferences guide your judgment.~
And about the legal issues, it highly depends about where is the server. Is its in Texas, well shit. If it's in Seattle, there's no reasons then.
Tycloud
5 years, 7 months ago
"Please, don't let your preferences guide your judgment.~" can you explain what you mean?
Tore
5 years, 7 months ago
Well, if an example may helps you, if hamburgers would be about to get banned, saying "Spaghetti tastes way better anyway" wouldn't be an argument, since it's a mater of taste, as for the human thingy.
Now, I'm not saying that's exactly what you were doing, but it does go in the same way, without being really an 'argument'.
Tycloud
5 years, 7 months ago
Its an opinion. saying "Please, don't let your preferences guide your judgment.~" wont change my opinion.
Tore
5 years, 7 months ago
Preferring furries over humans is not an opinion, it is a preference. One can't argue against a preference, that's why it doesn't have it simply doesn't have its place in a argumentation.
Tycloud
5 years, 7 months ago
Please reread what i had said. "Besides anthros are way better looking then humans." That is obviously my opinion. And your asking me not to let my preferences affect my opinion?
Tore
5 years, 7 months ago
To me, it's clearly a preference ^^'. And even if it would be an opinion, I don't think that "Tycloud thinks that anthros look better than humans, so we should ban every human from the website" would be a really good argument, that's why I'm saying that it's irrelevant to the actual subject; I really don't want to be mean or anything.
Tycloud
5 years, 7 months ago
ok, well maybe this will help you. http://pranshuarya.com/therightanswer/17/what-is-the-d...
either way, im done discussing it.
FISHH0UND
5 years, 7 months ago
Personally IB is a mixed bag. While it may look good and have some of the best features on an artist website (like the keyword blocker and multiple uploads), the content itself is...meh.

This website is mainly known for ponies and smut.

FA may run and look like shit, but at least it has more variety when it come to art.

What pisses me off the most about this website is that they would allow cub porn over human x animal/creature interaction (which doesn't make sense, given the fact they're both are technically illegal in the USA....what country owns IB?)

I can understand FA banning cub/loli/shota porn because characters involved are underage, but I don't understand why IB would remove fantasy creatures being just SLIGHTLY intimate with humans. :/
Tore
5 years, 7 months ago
Amen to that!
OOOeyGoooey
5 years, 7 months ago
i dont see the matter on this, ToS or not, we can sep link it through Dropbox or other sites without administrative action from mods.

As for your view on people hating this and that, you hating MLP, others hating humans

" "You can please some people some of the time but you cant please all the people all of the time"


though it would be cool to just HAVE them on here, its kinda dumb some people get so bent over shit like alertpay in FA and stuff, its a fucking cartoon char, get over yourselves, i say to them :\ ;;
New Comment:
Move reply box to top
Log in or create an account to comment.