Better to try the original first, the story is pretty well done, but you can't go wrong with any of the fallout series. unless you dont like the later FPS/RPG thing that Bethesda did. but i enjoy both ^_^
plus the first one has the MASTER, he's a bad-ass villain x3
Better to try the original first, the story is pretty well done, but you can't go wrong with any of
the new ones are a bit needy when it comes to laptops, it's huge open world like skyrim so draw distance becomes an issue. yours i remember was a bit worse than mine and i can't run those games. we're both lucky we can run borderlands xD
i was meaning the old ones xD the new ones are a bit needy when it comes to laptops, it's huge open
just dont go in expecting anything like fallout 3 or NV. it's a TOTALLY different game, and a bit dated. but if you like old school top down turn based RPG's then you'd like it. i for one dont care for the battle system but i play it for the engaging story, since i love the story of the fallout universe
just dont go in expecting anything like fallout 3 or NV. it's a TOTALLY different game, and a bit da
Eh, I bought both of them years ago, and they never really grabbed me. I don't really know why, since the plot summaries I've read prove that the story is actually really good, and the gameplay isn't that different, but eh.
Eh, I bought both of them years ago, and they never really grabbed me. I don't really know why, sinc
I guess the first? I personally prefer the second for obvious reasons of improvement, but you might want to play the first one just because the second one makes a lot of references to it and it's better to get a grasp of the old before going to the newer.
FFFF-I love fallout ;~;
I guess the first? I personally prefer the second for obvious reasons of improvement, but you might
Start at the beginning. I think the first Fallout helps to establish the setting better than the second, and chronologically one comes first. There isn't any real difference in gameplay between them, so you could play two first and it wouldn't be weird to go back to one. But storywise, I'd say you should play one first.
Start at the beginning. I think the first Fallout helps to establish the setting better than the se
I prefer the first Fallout to the second one. The second game has more to do, but it tries a little too hard to be 'adult' and 'edgy'. Also, Fallout 2 has much more FedExing than the first one. 'go here and bring me that foozle'.
I prefer the first Fallout to the second one. The second game has more to do, but it tries a little
ive only ever played fallout one, its a clasic old style crpg [which is to say HARD AS FUCK] its very easy to die if you dont watch what your doing, and i don't think theres a dificulty control.
ive only ever played fallout one, its a clasic old style crpg [which is to say HARD AS FUCK] its ver
You don't meet Deathclaws at random unless your Luck stat is really, really, REALLY low, until you hit a much higher level. Offhand I don't know what level I usually got to the Boneyard out and took out the nest there. I'd have to play it again to check. Called shots to the legs and 'running away' usually works if you don't have the firepower to actually take one out, though.
You don't meet Deathclaws at random unless your Luck stat is really, really, REALLY low, until you h
Word of warning. The fallout games are HARD. I sank a few hours into fallout 2. Died to...everything. Giant plant? 30% chance of hit and it'll do 10% health damage. He hits be back I lose a 1/3 of my health. Bandits? Pretty consistently outnumbered 3-4 to 1, dish out same damage as you do. Just...wow. This game is TRYING to kill you, with everything its got. But that's how ALL the old RPG's are.
Word of warning. The fallout games are HARD. I sank a few hours into fallout 2. Died to...everything
