On the Allure of Potty Rebellion
By: PedoCoon (of fucking course)
People often ask me what exactly appeals to me about the subjects I dwell on so much, those being, put in overly academic terms for comedic effect, the act of children intentionally defecating and urinating in their garments for the sake of convenience, continuing their play, or pure subjective enjoyment of the act. This of course also includes persistence if wear and if course use of absorbent undergarments usually associated with infancy and disability i.e diapers. These themes arouse me greatly, much more so than dwelling on the thoughts of sexual conduct itself with children or adults. The reason for this is frankly a mystery to myself just as much as it is to others, at least in large part.
I can at least attempt to surmise /what/ about this subject catches my attention to this degree, though the root cause is another story. Essentially it comes down to the taboo of it, though not merely in the sense of contrainism. The nature of the taboo is of import. Rejecting forced change, being one’s own self and handling these universal and unescapally quite intimate needs the way one chooses rather than the way that society attempts to force. Potty rebels are the ultimate icons of free thought, of the admirable art of living one’s best life.
As an autistic individual, resistance to forced change without good reason is something I can very strongly relate to. The fact of the matter is children who say there’s no reason they can’t continue wearing diapers, or can’t relieve themselves in their undergarments are largely correct. Teaching proper cleaning habits in a way that doesn’t unduly discourage the behavior would likely be on the same level of difficulty as potty training itself. Reading forums of parents complaining about their kids resisting potty training is extremely frustrating. They make claims of “teaching responsibility” and “telling [the child] why it’s not okay'' but themselves unquestionably accept these frankly false premises. Often they even make claims of “self respect” somehow being a reason to use the toilet. How does any of that remotely follow? It’s merely traditionalist thinking and has no objective weight to it.
Additionally many actions of “potty rebellion” actually don’t incur any additional cleaning or work for either the child or parent. Urinating in one’s clothes while outdoors creates an identical laundry burden to not doing so. Additionally, defecating undies indoors or outdoors is so trivial to clean for kids past toddler age that they often successfully do so without their parents even realizing their supposed transgression. Stained underwear are not in any way ruined and with how many people abuse laundry and run it hot and rough anyway is still easily thoroughly cleaned so long as the kid knows to dump the bulk of the excrement in the toilet. Despite all this these actions when discovered are often treated as some sort of tragic aberration from normal in need of intense and immediate intervention.
On a darker note, for children in abusive situations who have their autonomy taken from them in other ways, relieving their bodily needs how they choose is the one source of autonomy that never really can be taken from them. This is something recognized even in normative texts on “potty training” though the failure to realize the gravity and problematic nature of the overt attempt to manipulate the child out of this one source of autonomy is very disheartening.
And as for why all of this aroused me sexually to this degree, I think that for some reason or another dwelling on the thoughts I’ve discussed thus far has become sexual for me, additionally the physical sensations of wetting and soiling are admittedly conducive to arousal on their own in both myself and the subjects of my arousal i/e prepubescent children. I have little more to add for now. This concludes this segment of inane pedophiic procyonid ramblings.
| Viewed: |
169 times |
| Added: |
2 years, 10 months ago
18 Jun 2021 14:06 CEST
|
|
|
