Anybody else tired of Diaperfur icons?

by Thyne

It's like "I really don't want to look at a close up on the crotch of your diaperfur"
Can't blacklist it. So why not keep the fetishistic stuff out of icons? Everyone else seems to be
with the program.

I mean they don't even show the face of the character 90% of the time

Viewed:	27 times
Added:	7 years, 2 months ago 07 Feb 2017 21:18 CET

2 Comments on this Journal

Leave a Comment...

GreenReaper

7 years, 2 months ago

link

Well the face isn't the important part in such cases, is it…? >_>

Icons must have "no adult/offensive material". A diaper, by itself, would probably not qualify.
Suspecting that the member has a diaper fetish does not make the art inherently offensive.
Conversely, rubbing on the crotch of a diaper might well make it be considered adult.

If you feel there's a case there, feel free to file a ticket about it and we'll consider it.

Thyne

7 years, 2 months ago

link

@ GreenReaper

Hey, thanks for the response.

"Well the face isn't the important part in such cases, is it"
well that's really my point. When the focus isn't the face with diaperfurs it's the groin. It's fetishistic by nature. You open up their favs and to no surprise there is nsfw diaper fetish art. Which is fine. I don't have to view that if I so choose. Just that I don't have much choice when it comes to the icons in comment sections of images I do like.

I'll consider a ticket. For now I'll compile my thoughts and maybe rough draft it.

New Comment:

Move reply box to top ↑

Log in or create an account to comment.

Help

Information

Policy & Legal

All artwork and other content is copyright its respective owners.

Powered by Harmony 'Gravitation' Release 80.

Content Server: Virginia Cache - provided by Inkbunny Donors. Background: Blank Gray.

The Inkbunny web application, artwork, name and logo are copyright and trademark of their respective owners.