actually both work together creating a double negative which in any language but English would mean nothing, however being that it is in English it cancels out meaning you might be. No idea why they did that with English but there you have it. I personally however don't give a dang one way or the other.
actually both work together creating a double negative which in any language but English would mean
The buck are you talking about? Are you saying what he said means he's gay, or what he said means he's not gay but that's only because english is a weird ass language? I can't tell what you're trying to frickin' say, man!
The buck are you talking about? Are you saying what he said means he's gay, or what he said means he
Nope I'm saying because of the stupid double negative in English it could be taken that way even if he didn't mean it to sound that way. Either way I don't really care if he is or isn't I simply watch for his art, some of which I don't care for but some of which has a magnificent style and which I also can deeply appreciate. The ones I like of course have no male on male action but are either heterosexual or lesbian in nature. Isn't it interesting how one life style may be found enticing while another is only tolerated but not cared for? Then again he uses a triple negative including the print on the picture itself. In either case a triple negative in English is taken much the same way as a double negative so it doesn't really matter.
Nope I'm saying because of the stupid double negative in English it could be taken that way even if
Dude, no. Just no. What the buck, man! There is no freaking double negative ANYWHERE in his statements about his own homosexuality (or lack thereof). He said "no" in the title. Then he said "I'm not" in the actual journal. And "IM NOT GAY" in his ava pic. Those are completely seperate from each other. And even if they weren't, it STILL wouldn't be a bucking double or triple negative. The "no" is either a direct answer to a yes or no question, or an expression meaning something like "You are wrong!" or "They are wrong!", the "I'm not" is there to specify what is wrong, it is not directly connected to the "no", even if they were in the same sentence (which they're not). Only another "not" can create a double negative. No amount of "no"s can create a double negative. And his pic is clearly a complete sentence, just like the journal. Two different sentences can't form a double negative together. The second "not" has to be in the same sentence. Example: "I'm not gay, I AM NOT!" Not a double negative. "I'm not NOT gay." or "I ain't not gay!" Double negatives. The first of which can be pretty clearly interpreted as a positive. He says he does not have the property "not gay", making him gay. The second is a little trickier, the meaning can be concluded from context, emphasis placement and tone of voice.
Dude, no. Just no. What the buck, man! There is no freaking double negative ANYWHERE in his statemen
then your not paying attention, look at the very top, he says, and I quote, "NO I'M NOT" which is indeed a double negative, however if you add the picture text that adds a third no, which creates a triple negative which has the same effect as a double negative. Did you actually read things? Are you really paying attention? I was you however just seem to want to argue so go away and leave me alone.
then your not paying attention, look at the very top, he says, and I quote, "NO I'M NOT" which is i
Well lets see, are you an actual English major? I know one of us is unless you happen to be as well, in which case two of us would be. But I seriously doubt you are though.
Well lets see, are you an actual English major? I know one of us is unless you happen to be as well
I'm just amusing myself with someone who wasn't paying attention to what you actually said then since they obviously don't understand things as well as they think they do turned around and tried to bite me for it when I actually don't care if you are or aren't. far as I'm concerned I don't even care one way or the other. But its amusing to listen to someone who really wasn't paying attention or didn't see things as they actually are. Me I just think whoever the idiot was that placed the double negative in English should be slapped upside down and sideways if they weren't already dead and buried when its the only language that uses the stupid thing in the first place.
I'm just amusing myself with someone who wasn't paying attention to what you actually said then sinc
Might want to talk with Theuncalledfor about that, he's the one attempting poorly to pick a fight. Actually I'm about to put him in my no talk to no listen to file. All the guy wants is to be negative and attempt to bash me for no real good reason anyway and while it was fun showing him as a true fool at first its beginning to become not fun, and just a pain since he can't even see any side but his no matter how wrong he happens to be. I just finally got tired of it really, and their name is very apt since their reaction was indeed UNCALLED FOR at least they chose a name that fit their actions if nothing else.
Might want to talk with Theuncalledfor about that, he's the one attempting poorly to pick a fight.
